Wilson v. Fannie Mae et al
Filing
22
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 10/3/14. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
GARY WILSON,
Case No. 14-cv-02094-JD
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
FANNIE MAE, et al.,
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR
UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE
CONFERENCE
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulation and proposed order selecting mediation as
14
their proposed Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process. Dkt. No. 21. This action,
15
however, is a foreclosure-related action in which the subject property does not appear to have been
16
foreclosed upon, and this District’s ADR Unit has substantial experience helping parties resolve
17
their disputes in such cases.
18
Consequently, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers
19
this action to the ADR Unit for a telephone conference to assess in greater detail this case’s
20
suitability for mediation or a settlement conference. Plaintiff’s and defendants’ counsel will
21
participate in a telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit as soon as possible but no
22
later than October 24, 2014.
23
Plaintiff’s and defendants’ counsel will be prepared to discuss the following subjects:
24
(1)
Identification and description of claims and alleged defects in loan documents.
25
(2)
Prospects for loan modification.
26
(3)
Prospects for settlement.
27
The parties need not submit written materials to the ADR Unit for the telephone
28
conference.
1
In preparation for the telephone conference, plaintiff will do the following:
2
(1)
3
4
Review relevant loan documents and investigate the claims to determine whether
they have merit.
(2)
If plaintiff is seeking a loan modification to resolve all or some of the claims,
5
plaintiff will prepare a current, accurate financial statement and gather all of the information and
6
documents customarily needed to support a loan modification request. Further, plaintiff will
7
immediately notify defendants’ counsel of the request for a loan modification.
8
9
10
(3)
Provide counsel for defendants with information necessary to evaluate the
prospects for loan modification, in the form of a financial statement, worksheet or application
customarily used by financial institutions.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
In preparation for the telephone conference, counsel for defendants will do the following:
12
(1)
13
14
15
If defendants are unable or unwilling to do a loan modification after receiving
notice of Plaintiff’s request, counsel for defendants will promptly notify plaintiff to that effect.
(2)
Arrange for a representative of each defendant with full settlement authority to
participate in the telephone conference.
16
The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time of the telephone conference.
17
After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation for
18
further ADR proceedings.
19
In the interim, the case management conference that was set for October 15, 2014 is
20
vacated. The Court will re-set a date for the case management conference after the parties’
21
participation in the telephone conference with the ADR Unit. The Court will also defer ruling on
22
the pending motion to dismiss until this process is complete.
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 3, 2014
______________________________________
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?