Sehr v. United States of America et al
Filing
11
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 9 STIPULATION STAYING CASE filed by Robert J. Sehr, Jr. Status Report due by 9/9/2014. Status Conference set for 9/16/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Vince Chhabria. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 6/11/2014. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2014)
1
2
3
4
GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP
CLEMENT L. GLYNN (Bar No. 57117)
JONATHAN A. ELDREDGE (Bar No. 238559)
One Walnut Creek Center
100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 210-2800
Facsimile: (925) 945-1975
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Robert J. Sehr, Jr., as successor trustee of the
Weller Trust
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
)
ROBERT J. SEHR, JR. as successor trustee )
of the WELLER TRUST,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BRYAN WELLER, an individual; UNITED )
STATES OF AMERICA; STATE OF
)
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT
)
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT; ALL
)
PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAIMING ANY )
INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, and
)
DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. CV 14-02100 VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER STAYING CASE
AS MODIFIED
20
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2014, this partition case was filed in the probate department 1
21
22
(Judge Sugiyama) of the Superior Court for the County of Contra Costa to partition a commercial
23
property located at 254 Rose St., Danville, California that is owned by Plaintiff and Defendant
24
Bryan Weller with federal tax liens on the property held by Defendant United State of America;
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff received special permission from Judge Sugiyama to file in the probate department
instead of the civil department as there were related and consolidated cases already pending
before Judge Sugiyama.
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE
WHEREAS, on May 7, 2014, this case was removed to this Court by Defendant United
1
2
State of America;
3
WHEREAS, before removal, this case was consolidated with six additional cases in the
4
probate department also pending before Judge Sugiyama, including a wills/estate action (In the
5
Matter of the Estate of Beverly J. Weller, Case No. MSP11-00814), a trust action (In the Matter
6
of the Weller Trust, Case No. MSP11-00406), a fraud/fiduciary duties action (Weller v. Sehr,
7
Case No. C12-01649), a quiet title action (related to the commercial property at issue here)
8
(Weller v. Sehr, Case No. MSC12-02106), a nuisance action (Sehr v. Weller, Case No. MSL13-
9
01120) and a partition action (related to a residential property owned by Plaintiff and Defendant
10
Bryan Weller) (Sehr v. Weller, Case No. MSC12-02336) (collectively the “Actions”); 2
11
WHEREAS, Defendant Bryan Weller is or was a party to all of the Actions and
12
Defendant United States of America is a party to the partition action related to the residential
13
property; 3
WHEREAS, the federal tax liens at issue in this case are also at issue in the partition
14
15
action related to the residential property;
16
WHEREAS, an interlocutory judgment has been issued in the partition action related to
17
the residential property, which has a provision relating to the payment of the federal tax liens, a
18
referee has been appointed to sell the residential property and offers to purchase the residential
19
property have been received;
20
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the residential property will be sold in the next few
21
months, and the proceeds of the sale will be used to pay off debts on the house, including the
22
federal tax liens at issue in this case;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff disputes that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this
23
24
case as Plaintiff contends that the property at issue is also at issue in previously filed state court
25
2
26
27
The property at issue in this action (254 Rose St., Danville, California) is at issue in the
wills/estate action, the trust action, the fraud/fiduciary duties action, the quiet title action and the
nuisance action.
3
28
Defendant State of California Employment Development Department disclaimed in the state
court all rights in the property and is no longer a party to this action
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE
1
actions, including multiple probate actions and a quiet title action, that the United States of
2
America has waived the right to remove due to its litigating its federal tax liens in state court and
3
that abstention principles require that the case be remanded to state court;
4
WHEREAS, the parties believe that rather than engaging in motion practice to determine
5
whether this case should be remanded to the state court and engaging in preliminary case matters
6
(e.g., initial disclosures, initial case management conferences), the case should be stayed so that
7
the federal tax liens can be resolved in the state court partition action, following which Defendant
8
United States of America will likely be dismissed from both the state court case as well as the
9
above-captioned case so that this case can be remanded back to state court;
10
THEREFORE, subject to the Court’s order so providing, the parties stipulate that this
11
case shall be stayed for 90 days from the date of the Court’s Order. If a dismissal of the United
12
States of America is not filed within 75 days following entry of the Court’s Order, Plaintiff shall
13
notify the Court of the status of the underlying partition case so that the Court may determine
14
how best to proceed.
15
Dated: June 10, 2014
GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP
16
17
By
/s/ Jonathan A. Eldredge
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Robert J. Sehr, Jr., as successor trustee
of the Weller Trust
18
19
20
Dated: June __, 2014
BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS
SMITH LLP
21
22
By
Attorneys for Defendant Bryan Weller
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 10, 2014
By
/s/ Cynthia Stier
CYNTHIA STIER
Assistant United States Attorney
Tax Division
Attorney for Defendant United States of
America
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE
ORDER AS MODIFIED
1
2
The Court ORDERS that this case shall be stayed for 90 days from the date of the Court’s
3
Order. If a dismissal of the United States of America is not filed within 75 days following entry
4
of the Court’s Order, Plaintiff shall notify the Court of the status of the underlying partition case
5
so that the Court may determine how best to proceed. A Status Conference is set for
6
September 16, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. A Status Conference statement shall
be due no later than September 9, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
ER
br ia
R NIA
e Chha
FO
inc
J u d ge V
H
14
RT
13
D
AS MO
NO
12
D
The Honorable Vince Chhabria
RDERE
S SO O Court Judge
United States DistrictFIED
IT I
I
LI
11
UNIT
ED
10
11
Dated: June __, 2014
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
9
S
8
A
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE
C
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 45
1
2
I, Jonathan A. Eldredge, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
3
obtained from any signatories indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed
4
document.
5
6
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct.
7
8
9
10
11
Dated: June 10, 2014
GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP
/s/ Jonathan A. Eldredge
Jonathan A. Eldredge
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?