Ogloza v. The Hertz Corporation et al

Filing 15

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 18, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2014)

7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Defendants
THE HERTZ CORPORATION, DOLLAR
THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC.
and DTG OPERATIONS, INC.

ER

LI

Ju

R NIA

ey

. Chesn

xine M
dge Ma

A

H

6

Joren S. Bass, (Cal. Bar No. 208143)
[e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.344.7050

RT

5

NO

4

D*

DENIE

FO

S
3

UNIT
ED

2

Michael B. Garfinkel, (Cal. Bar No. 156010)
[e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP
1888 Century Park E., Suite 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1721
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310.788.3399

RT
U
O

1

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

* Denied as moot in light of the Court's Order
Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause Why
Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack
of Jurisdiction, filed concurrently herewith.
Dated: July 18, 2014

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

DARIUS OGLOZA,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

v.
THE HERTZ CORPORATION,
DOLLAR THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE
GROUP, INC.
and DTG OPERATIONS, INC.,

Case No. 14-cv-02103 MMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
BRIEFS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS COMPLAINT OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE FOR A MORE
DEFINITE STATEMENT
Action Filed: May 7, 2014

Defendants.
Hearing Date: September 12, 2014
Time:
9:00 a.m.
Courtroom: Courtroom 7, 19th Floor
Before:
Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
BRIEFS
Case No. 14-cv-02103 MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED:

3

1.

Defendants, having declined the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate

4

Judge, re-noticed their Joint Motion to Dismiss Complaint or in the Alternative for a More

5

Definite Statement (the “Motion to Dismiss”) for hearing before this Court, in accordance

6

with the instructions of the Clerk of Court;

7
8
9

2.

The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is now set for September 12, 2014 at

9:00 a.m.;
3.

Because Plaintiff’s counsel is unavailable to respond to Defendants’ Joint

10

Motion to Dismiss in the timeframe provided in Civil L.R. 7-3, the parties agree to alter

11

the briefing schedule set by Civil Local Rule 7-3 for the filing of Opposition and Reply

12

Briefs to the Motion to Dismiss;

13
14
15
16

4.

The parties stipulate that Plaintiff’s Opposition or Statement of

Nonopposition is due on or before August 8, 2014;
5.

The parties further stipulate that Defendants’ Reply is due on or before

August 29, 2014;

17

6.

This does not alter any existing deadline imposed by the Court.

18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

Dated: ______________________

21

______________________________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26

LEGAL122765712

27
28

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY
BRIEFS
Case No. 14-cv-02103 MMC