Bovino v. Incase Designs Corp

Filing 127

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria denying 96 Motion to Strike ; denying 96 Motion to Compel and Allowing Supplemental Briefing.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JERALD A. BOVINO,

Case No. 14-cv-02105-VC

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

INCASE DESIGNS CORP,
Defendant.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
STRIKE AND ALLOWING
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
Re: Dkt. No. 96

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

Incase's motion to strike is denied without prejudice to refiling it pending the outcome of
its early motion for summary judgment.
Incase may file a supplemental brief in support of its summary judgment motion for the

15

sole purpose of making the argument that Bovino's new infringement theory involving iPad users

16

is barred as a matter of law due to the License Agreement between Bovino and Apple/Target.

17

Incase's supplemental brief may not exceed five pages and is due on February 25, 2015. Bovino's

18

opposition, also not to exceed five pages, is due on March 4, 2015. No reply will be allowed.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 18, 2015
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge