Bovino v. Incase Designs Corp
Filing
127
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria denying 96 Motion to Strike ; denying 96 Motion to Compel and Allowing Supplemental Briefing.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JERALD A. BOVINO,
Case No. 14-cv-02105-VC
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
INCASE DESIGNS CORP,
Defendant.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
STRIKE AND ALLOWING
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
Re: Dkt. No. 96
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
Incase's motion to strike is denied without prejudice to refiling it pending the outcome of
its early motion for summary judgment.
Incase may file a supplemental brief in support of its summary judgment motion for the
15
sole purpose of making the argument that Bovino's new infringement theory involving iPad users
16
is barred as a matter of law due to the License Agreement between Bovino and Apple/Target.
17
Incase's supplemental brief may not exceed five pages and is due on February 25, 2015. Bovino's
18
opposition, also not to exceed five pages, is due on March 4, 2015. No reply will be allowed.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 18, 2015
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?