Bovino v. Incase Designs Corp

Filing 83

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 82 Stipulation Extending the Deadline for Mediation.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2014)

Download PDF
1 Ronnie Fischer Pro Hac Vice Marcy Railsback 2 9720 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 200 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 3 Telephone: (310) 276-4000 4 Ronnie@fischeresq.com Marcy@bovinorailsback.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff JERALD A. BOVINO 6 Brian E. Mitchell (SBN 190095) Marcel F. De Armas (SBN 289282) Mitchell + Company 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel: 415-766-3514 Fax: 415-402-0058 brian.mitchell@mcolawoffices.com mdearmas@mcolawoffices.com 7 Attorneys for Defendant INCASE DESIGNS, CORP 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 JERALD A. BOVINO, v. Plaintiff, 16 INCASE DESIGNS, CORP, 17 Case No.: 3:14-cv-02105-VC JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION AND ORDER Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION 1 1 Pursuant to ADR L.R. 6-5(a) and Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-1(a)(2), Plaintiff Jerald A. Bovino 2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Incase Designs, Corp (“Defendant”) hereby jointly request that the 3 Court extend the mediation deadline from November 11, 2014 to 60 days after the Court issues its 4 Claim Construction Order. In support of this request, the parties state the following: 5 1. This Court has not entered a Scheduling Order in this case. A Case Management 6 Conference is scheduled for October 7, 2014. (Dkt. No. 81.) 7 2. The Court has appointed Shirish Gupta as the mediator for this case, and a 8 mediation deadline has been set for November 11, 2014. The parties’ counsel and Mr. Gupta 9 conducted a pre-mediation telephone conference, pursuant to ADR L.R. 6-6. However, the 10 mediation is not yet scheduled. 11 3. Incase believes that the prospects for settlement will be dictated by this Court’s 12 claim construction ruling, that settlement prior to claim construction is unlikely, and as such 13 mediating before claim construction would not be a good use of the parties’ time or ADR 14 resources. As such, Incase has proposed that the parties mediate 60 days after the Court issues its 15 Claim Construction Order. 16 4. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the Court extend the mediation 17 deadline from November 11, 2014 to 60 days after the Court issues its Claim Construction Order. 18 The parties further request that the Court maintain the present Case Management Conference date 19 on October 7, 2014. 20 5. Pursuant to ADR L.R. 6-5(a), this Stipulation is being served on Mr. Gupta. Mr. 21 Gupta has indicated that he will apprise the ADR Unit regarding this Stipulation. 22 23 Dated: September 10, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 24 /s/ Marcel F. De Armas Marcel F. De Armas 25 26 27 28 Brian E. Mitchell Marcel F. De Armas MITCHELL + COMPANY 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 766-3515 Facsimile: (415) 402-0058 brian.mitchell@mcolawoffices.com mdearmas@mcolawoffices.com Attorney for Defendant INCASE DESIGNS, CORP BY: /S/ RONNIE FISCHER_______ Ronnie Fischer Attorney for Plaintiff JERALD A. BOVINO 9 10 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED 11 12 September 12, 2014 13 _________________________ Date 14 ______________________________ Honorable Vince Chhabria 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION 3 1 2 ATTESTATION I, Marcel F. De Armas, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file 3 this document. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Ronnie Fischer has 4 concurred in this filing. 5 6 Dated: September 10, 2014 7 By:/s/ Marcel F. De Armas Marcel F. De Armas 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR MEDIATION 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?