Ramirez v. Spearman
Filing
11
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 10 Motion to Transfer Case to the Eastern District of California.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ROBERTO SANTIAGO RAMIREZ,
Case No. 14-cv-02110-VC
Petitioner,
8
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
TRANSFER VENUE
9
10
SPEARMAN,
Re: Dkt. No. 10
Respondent.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Petitioner Roberto Santiago Ramirez, a state prisoner incarcerated at the California
14
Training Facility in Soledad, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 42
15
U.S.C. § 2254. On August 15, 2014, the Court issued an order for Respondent to show cause why
16
the petition should not be granted. On October 9, 2014, Respondent filed a motion to transfer this
17
action to the Eastern District of California. Ramirez has not filed an opposition.
18
According to the petition, Ramirez was convicted in the Kern County Superior Court of
19
shoplifting items worth $40.00 and was sentenced, under the three strikes law, to twenty-seven
20
years to life in prison. He challenges the twenty-seven year sentence as cruel and unusual
21
punishment. Kern County Superior Court lies in the Eastern District of California.
22
A petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a state prisoner in a State that contains two
23
or more federal judicial districts may be filed in either the district of confinement or the district of
24
conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). The district court where the petition is filed may transfer
25
the petition to the other district in the furtherance of justice. See id. Federal courts in California
26
traditionally have chosen to hear petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the district of
27
conviction. Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D. Cal. 1993); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a).
28
Because Ramirez is challenging the sentence imposed by the Kern County Superior Court,
1
venue for his habeas case lies in the Eastern District, not in this district. Accordingly,
2
Respondent’s motion to transfer venue is granted. The Court orders that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
3
1404(a) and Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b), the Clerk of the Court transfer this petition to the United
4
States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
5
This Order terminates docket number 10.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 14, 2014
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ROBERTO SANTIAGO RAMIREZ,
Case No. 14-cv-02110-VC
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9
10
SPEARMAN,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on 11/14/2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
Roberto Santiago Ramirez ID: K-37446
California Training Facility, North A-120-L
P.O. Box 705
Soledad, CA 93960
19
20
21
Dated: 11/14/2014
22
23
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
26
27
By:________________________
Kristen Melen, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable VINCE CHHABRIA
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?