Burns, et al v. Geo Grout, Inc. et al
Filing
14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, SUBJECT TO THE COURT RETAINING JURISDICTION OF THE ACTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/30/2014. (All deadlines and hearings are VACATED.) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2014)
Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
1 Erica J. Russell, Esq. (SBN 274494)
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
2 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
San Francisco, CA 94104
3 Telephone: (415) 882-7900
Facsimile: (415) 882-9287
4 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com
erussell@sjlawcorp.com
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6
Paul V. Simpson, Esq.
7 SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI PC
601 Gateway Blvd., Suite 950
8 South San Francisco, CA 94080
Telephone: (650) 615-4860
9 Facsimile: (650) 615-4861
psimpson@sgijlaw.com
10
Attorneys for Defendants
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
RUSSELL E. BURNS, et al.,
Case No.: C14-2121 WHO
Plaintiffs,
v.
GEO GROUT, INC., a California Corporation;
19 KENNETH ARTHUR THOLIN, an Individual,
20
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, SUBJECT TO
THE COURT RETAINING
JURISDICTION OF THE ACTION TO
ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT;
and ORDER THEREON
Defendants.
21
22
23 TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE WILLIAM H. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
24 COURT JUDGE, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA:
25
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs Russell E.
26 Burns, et al. (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Geo Grout, Inc., a California Corporation, and Kenneth
27 Arthur Tholin, an individual (collectively “Defendants”), as follows:
///
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; and ORDER THEREON
Case No.: C14-2121 WHO
G:\WHOALL\_cv\2014\2014_02121_Burns_v_Geo_Grout_Inc\14-cv-02121-WHO-Proposed_Stipulation_for_Dismissal.docx
-1-
1
1.
A full and final settlement of the above-titled action has been entered and agreed to
2 by all parties. Therefore, the parties request that this action be dismissed without prejudice, subject
3 to the Court retaining jurisdiction of the action to enforce the settlement agreement.
4
2.
The parties have reached an informal resolution regarding amounts due to Plaintiffs
5 by Defendants. Plaintiffs have agreed to allow Defendants to pay the amount due to Plaintiffs by
6 September 30, 2014, as follows:
7
(a)
Defendants’ first payment must be received by Plaintiffs by July 31, 2014;
8
(b)
Defendants’ second payment must be received by Plaintiffs by August 31,
(c)
Defendants’ final payment of the remaining balance due must be received
9 2014; and
10
11 by Plaintiffs by September 30, 2014.
12
3.
The parties’ settlement is contingent upon this Court agreeing to reserve and retain
13 jurisdiction of this action to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement.
Dated: July 24, 2014
SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES &
14
JACUZZI PC
15
By:
16
/S/
Paul V. Simpson
Attorneys for Defendants
17
18
Dated: July 24, 2014
SALTZMAN AND JOHNSON LAW
CORPORATION
19
By:
20
/S/
Erica J. Russell
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties, the above-titled case shall be dismissed
24
without prejudice while the Court reserves and retains jurisdiction of this action and the parties to
25 enforce the term of the parties’ settlement.
26
27
Dated: __July 30_____, 2014
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
28
-2STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; and ORDER THEREON
Case No.: C14-2121 WHO
G:\WHOALL\_cv\2014\2014_02121_Burns_v_Geo_Grout_Inc\14-cv-02121-WHO-Proposed_Stipulation_for_Dismissal.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?