Burns, et al v. Geo Grout, Inc. et al

Filing 14

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, SUBJECT TO THE COURT RETAINING JURISDICTION OF THE ACTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/30/2014. (All deadlines and hearings are VACATED.) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2014)

Download PDF
Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) 1 Erica J. Russell, Esq. (SBN 274494) SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 2 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 San Francisco, CA 94104 3 Telephone: (415) 882-7900 Facsimile: (415) 882-9287 4 mstafford@sjlawcorp.com erussell@sjlawcorp.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 Paul V. Simpson, Esq. 7 SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & JACUZZI PC 601 Gateway Blvd., Suite 950 8 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Telephone: (650) 615-4860 9 Facsimile: (650) 615-4861 psimpson@sgijlaw.com 10 Attorneys for Defendants 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 RUSSELL E. BURNS, et al., Case No.: C14-2121 WHO Plaintiffs, v. GEO GROUT, INC., a California Corporation; 19 KENNETH ARTHUR THOLIN, an Individual, 20 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, SUBJECT TO THE COURT RETAINING JURISDICTION OF THE ACTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; and ORDER THEREON Defendants. 21 22 23 TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE WILLIAM H. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT 24 COURT JUDGE, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: 25 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs Russell E. 26 Burns, et al. (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Geo Grout, Inc., a California Corporation, and Kenneth 27 Arthur Tholin, an individual (collectively “Defendants”), as follows: /// 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; and ORDER THEREON Case No.: C14-2121 WHO G:\WHOALL\_cv\2014\2014_02121_Burns_v_Geo_Grout_Inc\14-cv-02121-WHO-Proposed_Stipulation_for_Dismissal.docx -1- 1 1. A full and final settlement of the above-titled action has been entered and agreed to 2 by all parties. Therefore, the parties request that this action be dismissed without prejudice, subject 3 to the Court retaining jurisdiction of the action to enforce the settlement agreement. 4 2. The parties have reached an informal resolution regarding amounts due to Plaintiffs 5 by Defendants. Plaintiffs have agreed to allow Defendants to pay the amount due to Plaintiffs by 6 September 30, 2014, as follows: 7 (a) Defendants’ first payment must be received by Plaintiffs by July 31, 2014; 8 (b) Defendants’ second payment must be received by Plaintiffs by August 31, (c) Defendants’ final payment of the remaining balance due must be received 9 2014; and 10 11 by Plaintiffs by September 30, 2014. 12 3. The parties’ settlement is contingent upon this Court agreeing to reserve and retain 13 jurisdiction of this action to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement. Dated: July 24, 2014 SIMPSON, GARRITY, INNES & 14 JACUZZI PC 15 By: 16 /S/ Paul V. Simpson Attorneys for Defendants 17 18 Dated: July 24, 2014 SALTZMAN AND JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 19 By: 20 /S/ Erica J. Russell Attorneys for Plaintiffs 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties, the above-titled case shall be dismissed 24 without prejudice while the Court reserves and retains jurisdiction of this action and the parties to 25 enforce the term of the parties’ settlement. 26 27 Dated: __July 30_____, 2014 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 -2STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; and ORDER THEREON Case No.: C14-2121 WHO G:\WHOALL\_cv\2014\2014_02121_Burns_v_Geo_Grout_Inc\14-cv-02121-WHO-Proposed_Stipulation_for_Dismissal.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?