Cotten v. Asbestos Corp Ltd et al

Filing 106

ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 9/10/15. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

PATRICIA COTTEN, et al.,

Case No. 14-cv-02124-JD

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
DISMISSAL

9
10

NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING
COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

The Court was previously informed that the only remaining defendant who had not reached

14

a settlement with plaintiffs in this case was National Steel. Dkt. No. 99. On July 23, 2015,

15

defendant National Steel and Shipbuilding Company informed the Court that the action had been

16

resolved as to that defendant as well. Dkt. No. 101.

17

Consequently, based on the Court’s understanding that the action has been settled as

18

against all defendants, the Court dismisses this case without prejudice. If, however, any party

19

certifies to the Court within ninety days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration

20

for the settlement of this action has not been delivered over, then this order will be vacated and the

21

case will be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no such certification is filed, the

22

dismissal will be with prejudice after the passage of the ninety days.

23

The Court will not entertain any further requests for piecemeal dismissals, e.g., Dkt.

24

No. 105.

25

Dated: September 10, 2015

26
27
28

______________________________________
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge