Cotten v. Asbestos Corp Ltd et al

Filing 85

NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/26/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PATRICIA COTTEN, et al., Case No. 14-cv-02124-JD (JSC) Plaintiffs. 8 v. NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 9 10 ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: The above matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for settlement purposes. You are hereby notified that a Settlement Conference is scheduled for June 24, 2015, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 18 Francisco, California 94102. 19 20 1. Counsel shall ensure that whatever discovery is needed for all sides to evaluate the 21 case for settlement purposes is completed by the date of the Settlement Conference. Counsel shall 22 cooperate in providing discovery informally and expeditiously. 23 24 25 2. Lead trial counsel shall appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties. An attorney will not be permitted to serve as lead trial counsel at the pretrial conference or at trial unless the attorney participated in the June 24, 2015 settlement conference in person. Any party 26 27 28 who is not a natural person shall be represented by the person(s) with unlimited authority to negotiate a settlement. An insured party shall appear with a representative of the carrier with full 1 2 authority to negotiate up to the limits of coverage. A person who needs to call another person not present before agreeing to any settlement does not have full authority. 3. 3 Personal attendance of a party representative will rarely be excused by the Court. 4 To seek to excuse a party from personally attending a settlement conference, counsel for that party 5 shall meet and confer with counsel for all other parties to determine if there are any objections to 6 7 the moving party’s absence. Counsel must then lodge a letter with the Court, with copies to all parties, seeking to excuse the party’s participation. The letter shall recite the reasons for seeking 8 9 the party’s absence, as well as whether the other parties agree or object to the request and the reasons for any objection. The application to excuse a party must be lodged no later than the 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 lodging of the Settlement Conference Statement. 12 13 14 4. Each party shall prepare a Settlement Conference Statement, which must be LODGED with the undersigned’s Chambers (NOT electronically filed) no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the conference. Please 3-hole punch the document at the left side. 15 Each party shall also submit their Settlement Conference Statement in .pdf format and 16 17 email their statement to JSCPO@cand.uscourts.gov. 5. 18 The Settlement Conference Statement shall be served on opposing counsel. Any 19 party may submit an additional confidential statement to the Court. The contents of this 20 confidential statement will not be disclosed to the other parties and shall include: 21 a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. b. Any discrete issue that, if resolved, would facilitate the resolution of the c. The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers 22 23 24 case. 25 26 27 28 and a history of past settlement discussions. 7. The parties shall notify Chambers immediately at (415) 522-2172 if this case settles as to any defendant prior to the date set for the Settlement Conference. 2 1 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 26, 2015 ______________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?