LaFlamme v. Cate et al

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/23/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014)

1

*E-Filed 6/23/14*

2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

7
8

DONALD R. LAFLAMME,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

No. C 14-2208 RS (PR)

Petitioner,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

11

MATTHEW L. CATE, and
12 LIZARRAGA, Warden,
13

Respondents.
/

14
15

Petitioner has failed to comply with the Court’s order to (1) perfect his application to

16

proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or (2) pay the filing fee of $5.00. His IFP application

17

lacks a certificate of funds signed by an authorized prison officer and a prison trust account

18

statement showing transactions for the last six months. Accordingly, the action is

19

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to respond to the Court’s order and for failure to

20

prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Because this dismissal is without

21

prejudice, petitioner may move to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must contain

22

(1) the two documents listed above, or (2) full payment for the filing fee. Petitioner’s IFP

23

application (Docket No. 4) is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment in

24

favor of respondents, terminate Docket No. 4, and close the file.

25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 23, 2014
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge

28
No. C 14-2208 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL