Randal Pham v. Watts

Filing 19

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14

RANDAL PHAM, M.D., an individual,
Plaintiff,
vs.

15
16
17
18
19
20

DANIEL WATTS, an individual, DOES 1-10
inclusive,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 14-CV-02247-VC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENLARGE
TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S SPECIAL MOTION TO
STRIKE THE COMPLAINT OF RANDAL
PHAM
Courtroom: 4, 17th Floor
Judge: Hon. Vince Chhabria

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

29
30
31

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLF’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME
CASE NO. 14-CV-02247-VC

ORDER

1

On June 10, 2014, Plaintiff filed its Motion to Enlarge Time to File Opposition to Defendant’s

2
3

Special Motion to Strike the Complaint of Randal Pham (“Motion to Enlarge Time”).

4
5

Having considered the papers filed by the parties, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Enlarge
Time.

6

IT IS ORDERED that the hearing currently scheduled for July 3, 2014 for Defendant’s motion

7

to strike the complaint of Plaintiff Randal Pham (Doc. 14) is hereby vacated. Defendant may re-notice

8

its motion to strike within fourteen (14) days after the Court’s ruling on the Order to Show Cause, if the

9

Court determines that is has jurisdiction over the present action. Plaintiff’s response to any motion to

after Defendant re-notices its motion.

15

UNIT
ED

14

11
Dated: June ____, 2014

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16

ER

20

e Chha

br ia

LI

inc
J u d ge V

A

H

19

RT

18

NO

17

RT
U
O

13

S

12

R NIA

11

strike, if necessary, after the Court determines the jurisdictional question, shall be due within 21 days

FO

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

29
30
31

2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLF’S MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME
CASE NO. 14-CV-02247-VC