Corral v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al

Filing 18

ORDER SETTING FINAL DEADLINE FOR OPPOSITION: Response must be e-filed by 7/2/2014 at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/1/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2014)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

ESPERANZA CORRAL,

Case No. 14-cv-02251-MEJ

Plaintiff,
5
v.

ORDER SETTING FINAL DEADLINE
FOR OPPOSITION

6
7
8

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.,
et al.,
Defendants.

9
On May 22, 2014, the Defendants in the above-captioned matter filed a Motion to Dismiss.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Dkt. No. 8. As Plaintiff Esperanza Corral failed to file an opposition pursuant to Civil Local Rule

12

7, the Court ordered her to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to

13

prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines. Dkt. No. 14. In response, Plaintiff stated

14

that her counsel “was not served with or at least never received the motion to dismiss.” Dkt. No.

15

15. Although the Court’s Notice of Electronic Filing notification associated with Defendants’

16

Motion established that Plaintiff’s counsel was, in fact, served via ECF, the Court discharged the

17

OSC and ordered Plaintiff to file any Opposition by June 27, 2014. Dkt. No. 17. The Court

18

reminded counsel of his duty to stay current with all filings in this case and advised that sanctions

19

may be imposed for any further delay. Id.

20

Plaintiff has again failed to file a response, despite the fact that Defendants’ Motion has

21

been pending for nearly six weeks. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to e-file any

22

Opposition by July 2, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. Failure to comply with this Order shall result in the

23

dismissal of Plaintiff’s case without prejudice.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 1, 2014
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge