Corral v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
ORDER SETTING FINAL DEADLINE FOR OPPOSITION: Response must be e-filed by 7/2/2014 at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/1/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 14-cv-02251-MEJ
ORDER SETTING FINAL DEADLINE
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.,
On May 22, 2014, the Defendants in the above-captioned matter filed a Motion to Dismiss.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Dkt. No. 8. As Plaintiff Esperanza Corral failed to file an opposition pursuant to Civil Local Rule
7, the Court ordered her to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to
prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines. Dkt. No. 14. In response, Plaintiff stated
that her counsel “was not served with or at least never received the motion to dismiss.” Dkt. No.
15. Although the Court’s Notice of Electronic Filing notification associated with Defendants’
Motion established that Plaintiff’s counsel was, in fact, served via ECF, the Court discharged the
OSC and ordered Plaintiff to file any Opposition by June 27, 2014. Dkt. No. 17. The Court
reminded counsel of his duty to stay current with all filings in this case and advised that sanctions
may be imposed for any further delay. Id.
Plaintiff has again failed to file a response, despite the fact that Defendants’ Motion has
been pending for nearly six weeks. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to e-file any
Opposition by July 2, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. Failure to comply with this Order shall result in the
dismissal of Plaintiff’s case without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 1, 2014
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?