Perryman v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP et al
Filing
228
STIPULATION AND ORDER re #225 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER re JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATIONS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Southwest Business Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 29, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2016)
1
2
3
4
DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP
DENNIS J. KELLY (SBN No. 191414)
J. CROSS CREASON (SBN No. 209492)
353 Sacramento Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 397-2700
Facsimile:
(415) 397-3300
5
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
10
11
12
MARGO PERRYMAN, on behalf of herself
and others similarly situated,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
17
LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP; OCWEN
LOAN SERVICING LLC; SOUTHWEST
BUSINESS CORPORATION; AMERICAN
SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, and
DOES 1-100, inclusive
18
Defendants.
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
Case No. 3:14-cv-02261-JST
JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT
SOUTHWEST BUSINESS
CORPORATION’S RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:
TBD
TBD
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
9, 19th Floor
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, 6-1 (b ), it is hereby stipulated by and between Southwest
Business Corporation (“SWBC”) and plaintiff Margo Perryman (“Perryman”) through their
respective attorneys, that:
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2015, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), the Court
dismissed Perryman’s First Amended Complaint as against SWBC, with leave to amend;
WHEREAS, on September 14, 2015, the Final Judgment was entered in Lee v. Ocwen
25
Loan Servicing, LLC, Assurant Inc. and American Security Insurance Co., Case No. 0:14-60649-
26
JAL (S.D.Fla.) (“Lee”), which judgment enjoins Perryman from prosecuting her claims against
27
certain defendants in this action;
28
Page 1 – Case No. 3:14-cv-02261
JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION’S
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
WHEREAS, Perryman has filed a Notice of Appeal in Lee, and filed her opening appellate
1
2
brief in the 11th Circuit on December 23, 2015;
3
WHEREAS, on January 14, 2016 the United States District Court for the Southern District
4
of New York preliminarily approved a class settlement in Lyons et al. v. Litton Loan Servicing LP
5
et al., Case No. 1:13-cv-00513 (S.D.N.Y.) (“Lyons”), which preliminary approval order enjoins
6
Perryman from prosecuting her claims against certain defendants in this action;
WHEREAS, on January 15, 2016, Perryman filed a Second Amended Complaint (SAC),
7
8
including claims against SWBC;
WHEREAS, SWBC intends to file a motion to stay this action as to SWBC pending final
9
10
resolution of the settlement proceedings in Lee and Lyons;
WHEREAS, Perryman and SWBC agree that, SWBC’s time to respond to the SAC, should
11
12
be extended until such date as the Court sets, if any, upon resolution of SWBC’s motion to stay;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject
13
14
15
to the Court's approval:
•
motion to stay; and
16
17
SWBC’s time to respond to the SAC shall be set by the Court upon resolution of SWBC’s
•
This will not alter the existing deadlines for other defendants in this action.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
SEEN AND AGREED:
Dated: January 28, 2016
LAW OFFICE OF SHERI L. KELLY
By: _/s/Sheri L. Kelly________________
SHERI L. KELLY
slk@sherikellylaw.com
31 E. Julian Street
San Jose, CA 95112
Telephone: (408) 287-7712
Facsimile: (408) 583-4249
Attorney for Plaintiff
Margo Perryman
28
Page 2 – Case No. 3:14-cv-02261
JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION’S
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
1
Dated: January 28, 2016
2
DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP
By: _/s/Dennis J. Kelly_______________
DENNIS J. KELLY
353 Sacramento Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 397-2700
Facsimile: 415) 397-3300
Attorney for Defendant Southwest Business
Corporation
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
FILER’S ATTESTATION
The undersigned filer attests, pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), that concurrence in the
filing of the documents has been obtained from the other signatory to this document.
Dated: January 28, 2016
DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP
12
13
14
15
16
By: _/s/Dennis J. Kelly______________
353 Sacramento Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 397-2700
Facsimile: 415) 397-3300
Attorney for Defendant Southwest Business
Corporation
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 – Case No. 3:14-cv-02261
JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION’S
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
•
motion to stay; and
14
ER
H
13
RT
12
nS
J u d ge J o
R NIA
11
. Ti ga r
FO
10
VE
APPRO
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States Judge D
RT
U
O
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
________________________________
NO
8
Dated: January 29, 2016
S
7
This will not alter the existing deadlines for other defendants in this action.
UNIT
ED
6
•
LI
4
5
SWBC’s time to respond to the SAC shall be set by the Court upon resolution of SWBC’s
A
3
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 4 – Case No. 3:14-cv-02261
JOINT STIPULATION RE DEFENDANT SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION’S
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?