Ivey v. Chase Bank

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING STIUPLATION TO CONTINUE 28 . Case Management Conference set for 10/22/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/8/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 PHILIP A. MCLEOD, CASB No. 101101 philip.mcleod@kyl.com NATHAN R. JASKOWIAK, CASB No. 248007 nathan.jaskowiak@kyl.com KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN A Professional Corporation 450 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, California 94133 Telephone: (415) 398-6000 Facsimile: (415) 981-0136 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., erroneously sued herein as CHASE BANK 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 Douglas K. Ivey, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Chase Bank, ALAW, and Does 1 to 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. C 14-02289 NC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: August 20, 2014 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom A, 15th Floor 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1KYL_SF650698 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE – CASE NO. C 14-02289 NC 1 Plaintiff DOUGLAS K. IVEY (“Plaintiff”), Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 2 (erroneously sued herein as Chase Bank) (“Chase”), and Defendant ALAW, by and through their 3 counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 4 5 6 1. On August 1, 2014, the Court granted Chase’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff’s deadline to file an amended complaint is August 22, 2014. 2. The Initial Case Management Conference is scheduled for August 20, 2014 at 10:00 7 a.m. Because the pleadings will not be at issue by August 20, 2014, the parties hereby stipulate in the 8 judicial economy to continue the Initial Case Management Conference, and the deadlines triggered by 9 that date, until a future date when the pleadings are at issue. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED 11 12 DATED: August 7, 2014 /s/ Nathan R. Jaskowiak PHILIP A. MCLEOD NATHAN R. JASKOWIAK KEESAL, YOUNG & LOGAN Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., erroneously sued herein as CHASE BANK DATED: August 7, 2014 /s/ Matthew Van Fleet MATTHEW VAN FLEET ALBERTELLI LAW PARTNERS CALIFORNIA, P.A. Attorneys for Defendant ALAW DATED: August 7, 2014 /s/ Peter Winkler PETER WINKLER Attorneys for Plaintiff DOUGLAS K. IVEY 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1KYL_SF650698 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE – CASE NO. C 14-02289 NC 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation, the Initial Case Management Conference is rescheduled to 3 _____________________ at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom A, 15th Floor. The last day to file a Rule 26(f) October 22, 2014 4 Report and Joint Case Management Statement shall be one week prior to the Initial Case Management 5 Conference. The last day to (1) meet and confer in advance of the filing of the Rule 26(f) Report and 6 Joint Case Management Statement; (2) file an ADR Certification; and (3) file either a Stipulation of 7 ADR Process of Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference, shall be three weeks prior to the Initial 8 Case Management Conference. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. RT 13 thanael Judge Na FILER’S ATTESTATION 16 A 15 M. Cousin H ER 14 R NIA _____________________________________ THE HONORABLE NATHANAEL COUSINS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE s NO 12 TED FO DATED: ___________________, 2014 August 8 GRAN LI 11 UNIT ED 10 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 2 N D IS T IC T R OF C I, Nathan R. Jaskowiak, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file 17 this Stipulation. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the attorney’s listed as 18 signatories above have concurred in this filing. 19 20 DATED: August 7, 2014 /s/ Nathan R. Jaskowiak ___________________ NATHAN R. JASKOWIAK 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2KYL_SF650698 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE – CASE NO. C 14-02289 NC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?