Roley v. GoPro, Inc.
Filing
21
ORDER granting 18 STIPULATION re 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines to Extend Deadlines filed by GoPro, Inc.. Case Management Statement due by 9/19/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/26/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/1/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANDREW ROLEY, an individual, on behalf of
himself and others similarly situated,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:14-cv-02320
ORDER TO EXTEND
DEADLINES IN ORDER SETTING
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND ADR DEADLINES
GOPRO, INC. f/k/a WOODMAN LABS, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Deadlines in Order Setting Initial Case
Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
The deadlines in the Order Setting Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and
ADR Deadlines are AMENDED as follows:
a.
8/29/14: Last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early
settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan;
b.
8/29/14: Last day to file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel;
c.
8/29/14: Last day to file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of
Need for ADR Phone Conference;
28
[PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES
Case No. 3:14-cv-02320
sd-646010
1
1
d.
2
state objection in Rule 26(f) Report.
3
e.
9/19/14: Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or
9/26/14: Initial Case Management Conference.
7
8
RDER
OO
IT IS S
RT
har
Judge C
ER
11
12
A
H
10
reyer
les R. B
NO
9
R NIA
Honorable CHARLES R. BREYER,
United States District Court Judge
ED
UNIT
ED
6
FO
August 1, 2014
LI
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
5
S
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES
Case No. 3:14-cv-02320
sd-646010
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?