Roley v. GoPro, Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER granting 23 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint and Deadlines in Order Setting Case Management Conference filed by GoPro, Inc.. Case Management Statement due by 10/17/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/24/2014 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco, Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/22/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDREW ROLEY, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:14-cv-02320 CRB ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND DEADLINES IN ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE GOPRO, INC. f/k/a WOODMAN LABS, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to Complaint and 19 Deadlines in Order Setting Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 20 The following deadlines in this case are AMENDED as follows: 21 a. 9/22/14: Last day for GoPro to respond to the Complaint; b. 9/29/14: Last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early 22 23 settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan; 24 c. 9/29/14: Last day to file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel; d. 9/29/14: Last day to file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of 25 26 Need for ADR Phone Conference; 27 28 [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES Case No. 3:14-cv-02320 sd-647449 1 1 e. 2 state objection in Rule 26(f) Report; 3 f. 10/17/14: Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or 10/24/14: Initial Case Management Conference. 4 5 Dated: August 22, 2014 Honorable Charles R. Breyer United States District Court Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES Case No. 3:14-cv-02320 sd-647449 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?