Skout, Inc v. Jen Processing, Ltd et al
Filing
83
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/28/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/19/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SKOUT, INC,
Case No. 14-cv-02341-RS
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING
ORDER
9
10
JEN PROCESSING, LTD, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case
13
Management Conference on November 19, 2015. After considering the Joint Case Management
14
Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and
15
good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
16
1.
17
The parties shall file a report in the next 60 days advising the Court on the status of the
18
STATUS REPORT
pleadings and ADR.
19
2.
AMENDING THE PLEADINGS.
20
The deadline to amend the pleadings without seeking leave from the Court shall be January
21
1, 2016. After that date, any amendment of the pleadings shall be governed by Rule 15 of the
22
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
23
3.
DISCOVERY.
24
On or before October 1, 2016 all non-expert discovery shall be completed by the parties.
25
Discovery shall be limited as follows: (a) ten (10) non-expert depositions per party; (b) twenty-
26
five (25) interrogatories per party, including all discrete subparts; (c) a reasonable number of
27
requests for production of documents or for inspection per party; and (d) a reasonable number of
28
requests for admission per party.
1
4.
DISCOVERY DISPUTES.
2
Discovery disputes will be referred to a Magistrate Judge. After the parties have met and
3
conferred, the parties shall prepare a joint letter of not more than 8 pages explaining the dispute.
4
Up to 12 pages of attachments may be added. The joint letter must be electronically filed under
5
the Civil Events category of “Motions and Related Filings > Motions--General > Discovery Letter
6
Brief.” The Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will advise the parties of how that
7
Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling, order more formal briefing, or
8
set a telephone conference or a hearing. After a Magistrate Judge has been assigned, all further
9
discovery matters shall be filed pursuant to that Judge’s procedures.
5.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
EXPERT WITNESSES.
The disclosure and discovery of expert witnesses shall proceed as follows:
a. On or before August 15, 2016, parties will designate experts in accordance with
12
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
13
b. On or before October 1, 2016, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal
14
Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed.
15
16
6.
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
17
A Further Case Management Conference shall be held on January 28, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
18
in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
19
California. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the
20
Conference.
21
7.
PRETRIAL MOTIONS.
22
All dispositive pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.
23
Each party is limited to one motion for summary judgment absent leave of Court. All pretrial
24
motions shall be heard no later than December 8, 2016.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 14-cv-02341-RS
28
2
1
2
3
Dated: November 19, 2015
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO. 14-cv-02341-RS
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?