Skout, Inc v. Jen Processing, Ltd et al

Filing 95

STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing With Prejudice Defendants Idoya Limited and Norman Demajo. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/10/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KAUFHOLD GASKIN LLP
STEVEN S. KAUFHOLD, ESQ. (SBN 157195)
Email: [e-mail]
QUYNH K. VU, ESQ. (SBN 286631)
Email: [e-mail]
388 Market St., Suite 1300
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-874-1071
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Skout, Inc.

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
JEN PROCESSING, LTD, JENNIFER
)
NICOLE NEWNHAM, CHRISTOPHER
)
RUSSELL NEWNHAM, INFIUM, LTD,
)
CITYNET LINE, V.A.N. KERESKEDELMI )
ES SZOLGALTATO BETETI TARSASAG, )
)
EPIOHOST LTD, EDIBERT IAN
)
DEGUZMAN, NORMAN DEMAJO, IDOYA )
LIMITED, BROUSKO INVESTMENTS
)
)
LIMITED, MANOEL LEVY, JASON
SILVER, JAKE RIOS, MINGKAI ZHANG, )
)
MR. ELITE TEAM, KRYZYSZTOF
)
SLAWINSKI and DOES 5-100,
)
)
Defendants.
)
SKOUT, INC.,

Case No.: 14-02341 RS
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANTS IDOYA LIMITED AND
NORMAN DEMAJO AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF IDOYA LIMITED AND NORMAN DEMAJO AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
Case No. 14-02341 RS

1

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF IDOYA LIMITED AND NORMAN DEMAJO

2

WITH PREJUDICE

3

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Skout, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed its First Amended Complaint for

4

Breach of Contract; Fraud; Unfair or Deceptive Business Practices; Violation of the Computer

5

Fraud and Abuse Act; Violation of the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and

6

Fraud Act; and Violation of the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and

7

Marketing Act on May 29, 2015.

8
9
10

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants Idoya Limited and Norman Demajo settled this
matter on or about March 2016.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants

11

Idoya Limited and Norman Demajo through their designated counsel that the above-captioned

12

action should be dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants Idoya Limited and Norman Demajo

13

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). The parties further stipulate that, except as set forth in the March

14

2016 Settlement Agreement between them, the parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees,

15

expenses, and costs.

16

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

17
18
19
20

Dated: March 10, 2016

KAUFHOLD GASKIN LLP
/s/ Steven S. Kaufhold
Steven S. Kaufhold

24

KAUFHOLD GASKIN LLP
Steven S. Kaufhold (SBN 157195)
[e-mail]
Quynh K. Vu (SBN 286631)
[e-mail]
388 Market St., Suite 1300
San Francisco, CA 94111
T: 415-445-4620

25

Attorneys for Skout, Inc.

21
22
23

26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF IDOYA LIMITED AND NORMAN DEMAJO AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
Case No. 14-02341 RS

1

1
2
3
4

Dated: March 10, 2016

GORDON & REES
/s/ James R. Reilly
James R. Reilly

5
6
7
8
9
10

GORDON & REES LLP
James R. Reilly (SBN 127804)
[e-mail]
James Holder (SBN 267843)
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
T: 415-986-5900
Attorneys for Idoya Limited and Norman Demajo

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF IDOYA LIMITED AND NORMAN DEMAJO AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
Case No. 14-02341 RS

2

1
ORDER

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing
therefor, orders as follows:
1.

The action is dismissed with prejudice as against Defendant Idoya Limited

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).
2.

The action is dismissed with prejudice as against Defendant Norman

Demajo pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).

9

3.

Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

10

4.

The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter, only to the extent

11

necessary, to enforce the terms of the March 2016 Settlement Agreement.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15

3/10/16
Dated: _____________________

______________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
Northern District of California

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF IDOYA LIMITED AND NORMAN DEMAJO AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
Case No. 14-02341 RS

3