United States of America, et al v. North American Health Care, et al

Filing 76

ORDER re 75 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by North American Health Care, Inc. Attorney Richard Joseph Doren added for North American Health Care, Inc. Attorneys Jason de Bretteville, Bradley Edward Marrett and Justin Nathanael Owens terminated. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/13/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Richard J. Doren, SBN 124666 rdoren@gibsondunn.com 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 Winston Y. Chan, SBN 214884 wchan@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Attorneys for Defendants 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. JOHN ORTEN, Relator; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. JOHN ORTEN, Relator; STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. JOHN ORTEN, Relator; CASE NO. 14-cv-02401-WHO DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; ORDER Complaint Filed: 1/17/2014 First Am. Complaint Filed: 3/25/2014 Second Am. Complaint Filed: 4/17/2014 STATE OF WASHINGTON, ex rel. JOHN ORTEN, Relator; STATE OF UTAH, ex rel. JOHN ORTEN, Relator; Plaintiffs, v. NORTH AMERICAN HEALTH CARE INC.; JOHN SORENSEN, Defendants. 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC 1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants North American Health Care, Inc. (“NAHC”) and 2 John Sorensen (collectively “Defendants”) hereby substitute Richard J. Doren of the law firm Gibson, 3 Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California and Winston Y. Chan of 4 the law firm of the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 555 Mission Street, San Francisco, 5 California, 94105, as counsel for Defendants in the above-captioned matter in place of Jason de 6 Bretteville, Justin N. Owens, and Bradley E. Marrett of the law firm Stradling Yocca Carlson & 7 Rauth, P.C., 660 Newport Center Dr., Suite 1600, Newport Beach, California 92660. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Pursuant to such substitution, Defendants hereby request that all notices, filings and other documents in this action be served on the following counsel: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Richard J. Doren 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 Email: rdoren@gibsondunn.com Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Winston Y. Chan 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105-0921 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 wchan@gibsondunn.com Please update service lists, and direct all future filings, discovery, and correspondence to Richard J. Doren and Winston Y. Chan. The undersigned parties consent to the above substitution of counsel. 23 24 DATED: November 11, 2015 NORTH AMERICAN HEALTH CARE INC. 25 26 By: /s/ WYLIE STROUT 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC 1 DATED: November 11, 2015 JOHN SORENSEN 2 3 By: /s/ JOHN SORENSEN 4 5 6 DATED: November 11, 2015 7 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH, P.C. By: 8 /s/ JASON DE BRETTEVILLE 9 10 DATED: November 11, 2015 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 11 12 By: /s/ RICHARD J. DOREN 13 Attorneys for Defendants 14 15 16 17 18 ATTESTATION: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories thereto has been obtained. 19 20 The above substitution of counsel is approved and IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 November 13, 2015 DATED: _____________________ _______________________________________ HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?