United States of America, et al v. North American Health Care, et al
Filing
76
ORDER re 75 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by North American Health Care, Inc. Attorney Richard Joseph Doren added for North American Health Care, Inc. Attorneys Jason de Bretteville, Bradley Edward Marrett and Justin Nathanael Owens terminated. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/13/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
Richard J. Doren, SBN 124666
rdoren@gibsondunn.com
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: 213.229.7000
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
Winston Y. Chan, SBN 214884
wchan@gibsondunn.com
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: 415.393.8200
Facsimile: 415.393.8306
Attorneys for Defendants
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
JOHN ORTEN, Relator;
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. JOHN
ORTEN, Relator;
STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. JOHN
ORTEN, Relator;
CASE NO. 14-cv-02401-WHO
DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF
WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF
COUNSEL; ORDER
Complaint Filed:
1/17/2014
First Am. Complaint Filed:
3/25/2014
Second Am. Complaint Filed: 4/17/2014
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ex rel. JOHN
ORTEN, Relator;
STATE OF UTAH, ex rel. JOHN ORTEN,
Relator;
Plaintiffs,
v.
NORTH AMERICAN HEALTH CARE INC.;
JOHN SORENSEN,
Defendants.
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC
1
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants North American Health Care, Inc. (“NAHC”) and
2
John Sorensen (collectively “Defendants”) hereby substitute Richard J. Doren of the law firm Gibson,
3
Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California and Winston Y. Chan of
4
the law firm of the law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 555 Mission Street, San Francisco,
5
California, 94105, as counsel for Defendants in the above-captioned matter in place of Jason de
6
Bretteville, Justin N. Owens, and Bradley E. Marrett of the law firm Stradling Yocca Carlson &
7
Rauth, P.C., 660 Newport Center Dr., Suite 1600, Newport Beach, California 92660.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Pursuant to such substitution, Defendants hereby request that all notices, filings and other
documents in this action be served on the following counsel:
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Richard J. Doren
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone:
213.229.7000
Facsimile:
213.229.7520
Email:
rdoren@gibsondunn.com
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Winston Y. Chan
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone:
415.393.8200
Facsimile:
415.393.8306
wchan@gibsondunn.com
Please update service lists, and direct all future filings, discovery, and correspondence to
Richard J. Doren and Winston Y. Chan.
The undersigned parties consent to the above substitution of counsel.
23
24
DATED: November 11, 2015
NORTH AMERICAN HEALTH CARE INC.
25
26
By:
/s/
WYLIE STROUT
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
2
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC
1
DATED: November 11, 2015
JOHN SORENSEN
2
3
By:
/s/
JOHN SORENSEN
4
5
6
DATED: November 11, 2015
7
STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH, P.C.
By:
8
/s/
JASON DE BRETTEVILLE
9
10
DATED: November 11, 2015
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
11
12
By:
/s/
RICHARD J. DOREN
13
Attorneys for Defendants
14
15
16
17
18
ATTESTATION: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other
signatories thereto has been obtained.
19
20
The above substitution of counsel is approved and IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
24
November 13, 2015
DATED: _____________________
_______________________________________
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
3
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL; CASE NO. 13-03826-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?