Nelson

Filing 11

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/9/14. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/10/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (lrcS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KAMARI NELSON, Case No. 14-cv-02406-JD Petitioner, 8 v. 9 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 2 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 This case was initiated when petitioner wrote a letter to the court regarding his conviction. 13 In an effort to protect his rights, it was filed as a new case. Petitioner was informed that he had 14 not filed a petition and was given twenty-eight days to do so. He also was sent a notice that he 15 had not paid the filing fee or applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”); again, he was 16 allowed twenty-eight days to either pay the fee or file the application. A copy of the court's form 17 for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice, along with a return envelope. 18 Petitioner has not filed a petition or IFP application. He has submitted a letter stating that 19 he has multiple cases pending and needs more time in the law library to prepare this petition and 20 requests an extension of the statute of limitations. This Court cannot extend the statute of 21 limitations or keep this case open indefinitely until petitioner is able to file the petition. Once 22 petitioner files a petition he may present arguments for tolling if the petition is determined to be 23 late. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice and petitioner may file a new case once his 24 petition is ready. No fee is due. The clerk shall close the file. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 9, 2014 ______________________________________ JAMES DONATO United States District Judge 27 28 14-cv-02406-JD-_dis

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?