Nelson
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/9/14. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/10/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (lrcS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
KAMARI NELSON,
Case No. 14-cv-02406-JD
Petitioner,
8
v.
9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 2
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
This case was initiated when petitioner wrote a letter to the court regarding his conviction.
13
In an effort to protect his rights, it was filed as a new case. Petitioner was informed that he had
14
not filed a petition and was given twenty-eight days to do so. He also was sent a notice that he
15
had not paid the filing fee or applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”); again, he was
16
allowed twenty-eight days to either pay the fee or file the application. A copy of the court's form
17
for applications to proceed IFP was provided with the notice, along with a return envelope.
18
Petitioner has not filed a petition or IFP application. He has submitted a letter stating that
19
he has multiple cases pending and needs more time in the law library to prepare this petition and
20
requests an extension of the statute of limitations. This Court cannot extend the statute of
21
limitations or keep this case open indefinitely until petitioner is able to file the petition. Once
22
petitioner files a petition he may present arguments for tolling if the petition is determined to be
23
late. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice and petitioner may file a new case once his
24
petition is ready. No fee is due. The clerk shall close the file.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 9, 2014
______________________________________
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
27
28
14-cv-02406-JD-_dis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?