Scholar et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 16

ORDER Regarding Mail Received by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2015)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

AURELIA SCHOLAR, et al.,

Case No. 14-cv-02415-EDL

Plaintiffs,
7
v.

ORDER REGARDING MAIL
RECEIVED

8
9

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

This is a mortgage foreclosure action brought by plaintiffs Aurelia and Aurthur Scholar in

12

Contra Costa Superior Court on April 23, 2014. Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. properly

13

removed the case to this Court on May 23, 2014. On August 1, 2014, Plaintiffs voluntarily

14

dismissed the case without prejudice.

15

On June 29, 2015, the Court received a submission via United States mail from plaintiff

16

Aurelia Scholar including a letter requesting that the Court remand the action back to state Court.

17

The letter states that Plaintiff refused to sign a General Release, and indicates that a foreclosure

18

sale of her house is imminent. However, Plaintiff does not explain any basis for reopening this

19

federal case or remanding the action to state court almost a year after the case was voluntarily

20

dismissed, and the request is therefore denied. Because Plaintiff’s submission consists primarily

21

of privileged attorney client communications, as well as what appear to be confidential settlement

22

communications and original copies of financial documents containing confidential personal

23

information, the entire submission shall be returned to Plaintiff and not entered on the Court’s

24

public docket.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 29, 2015
________________________
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge