Real Action Paintball, Inc. v. Advanced Tactical Ordnance Systems, LLC et al

Filing 138

ORDER modifying prior scheduling order. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on January 26, 2015. (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 REAL ACTION PAINTBALL, INC., Case No. 14-cv-02435-MEJ Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 ADVANCED TACTICAL ORDNANCE SYSTEMS, LLC, et al., Defendants. UNITED TACTICAL SYSTEMS LLC, 15 16 Case No. 14-cv-04050-MEJ Plaintiff, 13 14 ORDER MODIFYING PRIOR SCHEDULING ORDER v. REAL ACTION PAINTBALL, INC., et al., Defendants. 17 18 On January 22, 2015, the Court held a joint Case Management Conference with the Lead 19 Counsel in the related cases, Real Action Paintball, Inc. v. Advanced Tactical Ordnance Systems, 20 LLC, C-14-2435-MEJ (the “ATO Case”) and United Tactical Systems LLC v. Real Action 21 Paintball Inc., C-14-4050-MEJ (the “UTS Case”). The Court previously consolidated various 22 motions related to both the UTS and ATO cases. ATO case, Dkt. No. 130; UTS Case, Dkt. No. 23 117 (the “Jan. 7 Order”). Now, in lieu of the parties’ discussion in the joint Case Management 24 Conference, the Court hereby modifies the Jan. 7 Order as follows: 25 26 1) RAP4’s opposition to the motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (ATO 27 Case, Dkt. Nos. 13, 39; UTS Case, Dkt. No. 96) is due in both cases on March 12, 28 2015. The opposition shall be filed as one document and spread across the dockets of 1 both the ATO and UTS case (i.e., the opposition should be available in both cases). 2 3 2) The parties moving for lack of personal jurisdiction in both cases shall file a joint reply 4 to RAP4’s opposition, due on March 26, 2015. The joint reply shall be filed as one 5 document and spread across the dockets of both the ATO and UTS case. 6 7 3) Given that the parties will have fewer pages to oppose and reply to the motions than 8 they otherwise would, the Court will permit RAP4’s opposition to extend to 30 pages, 9 and the joint reply to extend to 20 pages. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 4) The Court will hold a joint hearing on these jurisdictional motions on April 9, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B. 13 14 15 In all other respects, the Jan. 7 Order remains operative. IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 18 19 Dated: January 26, 2015 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?