Real Action Paintball, Inc. v. Advanced Tactical Ordnance Systems, LLC et al
Filing
167
ORDER Vacating April 9, 2015 Hearings (mejlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
REAL ACTION PAINTBALL, INC.,
5
Plaintiff,
6
Case No. 14-cv-02435-MEJ
ORDER VACATING HEARINGS
v.
7
ADVANCED TACTICAL ORDNANCE
SYSTEMS, LLC, et al.,
8
Defendants.
UNITED TACTICAL SYSTEMS LLC,
9
10
Plaintiff,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 14-cv-04050-MEJ
v.
12
REAL ACTION PAINTBALL, INC., et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
The above-captioned matters are currently scheduled for a hearing on April 9, 2015
16
17
regarding motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction by Perfect Circle, Gary Gibson,
18
Michael Blumenthal, and David Piell (UTS Case, Dkt. No. 96; ATO Case, Dkt. Nos. 13; 39)1, as
19
well as Real Action’s Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint (ATO Case, Dkt. No.
20
153). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court
21
finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral argument and hereby VACATES the April
22
9, 2015 hearing. The matters are deemed under submission.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: April 6, 2015
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
27
28
1
The “ATO Case” refers to Real Action Paintball, Inc. v. Advanced Tactical Ordnance Systems, LLC et al., Case No.
14-2435-MEJ, whereas the “UTS Case” refers to United Tactical Systems, LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc. et al.,
Case No. 14-4050-MEJ.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?