Huricks et al v. Shopkick, Inc.

Filing 114

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 11, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ZAK HURICKS, et al.,

No. C-14-2464 MMC

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
Plaintiffs,
11
12

ORDER VACATING HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.
SHOPKICK, INC.,
Defendant.

13

/

14
15

Before the Court is defendant Shopkick, Inc.’s (“Shopkick”) “Motion for Summary

16

Judgment,” filed May 1, 2015. Plaintiffs Zak Huricks and Trista Robinson have filed

17

opposition, to which Shopkick has relied. Also, with leave of court, the parties have filed

18

supplemental briefs.1 Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in

19

opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for determination on the

20

parties’ respective written submissions, and VACATES the hearing scheduled for August

21

14, 2015.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: August 11, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

25
26
1

27
28

Plaintiffs failed to provide the Court with a chambers copy of their Statement of
Supplemental Authority and a supporting declaration, each filed July 31, 2015.
Nonetheless, the Court has considered those documents. For future reference, plaintiffs
are reminded that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the Court’s Standing Orders,
parties are required to provide for use in chambers one paper copy of each document that
is filed electronically.