York -v- Bank of America, et al
Filing
29
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO CHANGE TIME. Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 8/7/2014 01:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/25/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
WILLIE YORK,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 14-CV-02471 RS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER ON STIPUATION TO CHANGE
TIME
BANK OF AMERICA, CHAMPION
MORTGAGE and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
On June 25, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend certain dates and deadlines in this case.
(ECF No. 26). Pursuant to that stipulation, it is hereby ordered that:
-
Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint within thirty days of the date
of this order;
-
No defendant is required to file a responsive pleading until twenty days
after plaintiff files his First Amended Complaint;
-
The preliminary injunction hearing set for July 1, 2014 is continued to
August 7, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3 on the 17th Floor of 450
Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Defendants must file a
written response by Thursday, July 31, 2014. Plaintiff may file a reply, if
any, by August 4, 2014; and
-
The Temporary Restraining Order issued on June 3, 2014 shall remain in
full force and effect until a determination is made on plaintiff’s application
for a preliminary injunction.
23
24
25
26
27
28
14-cv-02471 RS ORDER REGARDING SERVICE
1
The parties are further reminded that all filings in this case must comply with the Civil
2
Local Rules of this district. For example, a stipulated request for an order changing time must
3
include, among other things, an attorney declaration. Civ. L. R. 6-2.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 6/25/14
7
8
9
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
14-cv-02471 ORDER REGARDING SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?