Stanton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Filing
13
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 12 Stipulation Dismissing Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
222 RUSH LANDING ROAD
P O BOX 6169
NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169
(415) 898-1555
BRAYTON˜PURCELL LLP
11
12
13
14
15
JUDITH STANTON, as Wrongful Death
Heir, and as Successor-in-Interest to
RONNIE STANTON, Deceased, and
SCOTT STANTON and VICKI
ZAMMITO, as Wrongful Death Heirs to
RONNIE STANTON, Deceased, and
AMY STANTON, as Successor-in-Interest
to RONNIE STANTON, JR., Deceased, as
Legal Heir of RONNIE STANTON,
Deceased,
16
Plaintiffs,
17
vs.
18
19
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
20
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
3:14-cv-02511-VC
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’
DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
OF DEFENDANT METROPOLITAN
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
21
22
23
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. All claims against Defendant
24
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY are hereby dismissed without prejudice
25
pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk is directed to close the case.
26
Dated: August 12, 2014
By:
Vince Chhabria
United States District Judge
27
28
1
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT METROPOLITAN
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?