Stanton v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Filing 13

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 12 Stipulation Dismissing Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222 RUSH LANDING ROAD P O BOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 BRAYTON˜PURCELL LLP 11 12 13 14 15 JUDITH STANTON, as Wrongful Death Heir, and as Successor-in-Interest to RONNIE STANTON, Deceased, and SCOTT STANTON and VICKI ZAMMITO, as Wrongful Death Heirs to RONNIE STANTON, Deceased, and AMY STANTON, as Successor-in-Interest to RONNIE STANTON, JR., Deceased, as Legal Heir of RONNIE STANTON, Deceased, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 vs. 18 19 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 20 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:14-cv-02511-VC ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 21 22 23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. All claims against Defendant 24 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY are hereby dismissed without prejudice 25 pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk is directed to close the case. 26 Dated: August 12, 2014 By: Vince Chhabria United States District Judge 27 28 1 ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?