Sanchez et al v. Capital Contractors Inc. et al
Filing
98
ORDER DIRECTING CAPITAL CONTRACTORS, INC. TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Capital Contractors, Inc. is ordered to show cause, in writing and no later than October 16, 2015, why the Third Party Complaint should not dismissed pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 2, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LILLIANA SANCHEZ, et al.,
No. C 14-2622 MMC
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DIRECTING CAPITAL
CONTRACTORS, INC. TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIRD PARTY
COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED
11
v.
12
CAPITAL CONTRACTORS INC.,
13
Defendant.
14
/
15
On today’s date, the Court approved the termination of the representation by
16
counsel of record for the Third Party Defendants in the above-titled action.
17
Given the circumstances under which said representation was initially brought to the
18
Court’s attention, it is not clear from the record that the Third Party Defendants have made
19
a voluntary appearance in the action, and the Court notes that they have never been
20
served with a summons and the Third Party Complaint.
21
Accordingly, the Third Party Complaint having been filed on June 27, 2014, Capital
22
Contractors, Inc. is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later than
23
October 16, 2015, why the Third Party Complaint should not dismissed pursuant to Rule
24
4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated: October 2, 2015
28
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?