Madero v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al

Filing 12

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: PLAINTIFF IS ADVISED THAT THIS CASE SHALL BE DISMISSED IF HE FAILS TO E-FILE HIS RESPONSES BY 7/24/2014. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/21/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JUAN MADERO, Case No. 14-cv-02658-MEJ Plaintiff, 8 v. SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. 12 13 On June 9, 2014, Plaintiff Juan Madero filed the above-captioned complaint, as well as an 14 application to proceed in forma pauperis. On June 18, the Clerk of Court directed Plaintiff to 15 either consent to or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction by June 25, 2014. Dkt. No. 7. Because 16 Plaintiff failed to comply with this deadline, the Clerk again directed Plaintiff to consent or 17 decline, with a new deadline of July 2, 2014. Dkt. No. 9. On June 24, the Court ordered Plaintiff 18 to file a declaration providing information in support of his in forma pauperis application. Dkt. 19 No. 8. Plaintiff failed to comply with these deadlines. 20 Based on this inaction, the Court ordered Plaintiff Juan Madero to show cause why this 21 case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines. 22 Dkt. No. 10. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a declaration by July 17, 2014, and warned him 23 that the Court may dismiss the case without a hearing if a responsive declaration was not filed. 24 Since issuance of the two Clerk’s notices and two orders from the Court, Plaintiff filed his 25 consent to proceed before a magistrate judge on July 11 (9 days after the second deadline), but has 26 not responded to either of the Court’s orders. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to e-file 27 responses to the June 24 in forma pauperis order and July 7 order to show cause by July 24, 2014. 28 No chambers copies are required. 1 2 3 Plaintiff is hereby advised that this case shall be dismissed if he fails to e-file his responses by July 24, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 Dated: July 21, 2014 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?