Quine v. Brown et al

Filing 182

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 181 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Shiloh Heavenly Quine. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 27, 2019. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2019)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
JAY C. RUSSELL
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
MARTINE N. D'AGOSTINO
Deputy Attorney General
Bar No. 256777
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation, Scott Kernan, S. Pajong, J.
Walker, D. Bright, and J. Dunlap

CHRISTOPHER J. BANKS, BAR NO. 218779
PHILLIP J. WIESE, BAR NO. 291842
LOUIS Y. LEE, BAR NO. 315753
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
SHAWN THOMAS MEERKAMPER, BAR No.
296964
TRANSGENDER LAW CENTER
PO Box 70976
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Shiloh Quine

12
13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17
18

SHILOH QUINE,

19
20
v.

21
22

SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,

23
24

C 14-02726 JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Date: N/A
Time: N/A
Defendants. Courtroom: 19
Judge: The Honorable Jon S. Tigar

25
26
27
28
1
DB2/ 36161006.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL (C 14-02726 JST)

1

Plaintiff Shiloh Quine and Defendants Scott Kernan, S. Pajong, D. Bright, J. Dunlap and

2

J. Lewis (collectively with Plaintiff and the California Department of Corrections and

3

Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), the “Parties”), submit the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of

4

Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

5
6

WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a Settlement Agreement on August 7, 2015 in this
action (Dkt. #49);

7

WHEREAS, paragraph III.1.I of the Settlement Agreement provided that “[u]pon

8

execution of all of this Agreement’s terms, Plaintiff agrees to dismiss the Complaint with

9

prejudice”;

10
11
12

WHEREAS, both Parties have fully executed all of the Agreement’s terms, as interpreted
by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, through

13

their undersigned counsel, that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to

14

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). No party shall seek from any other party

15

recovery of its costs and/or attorneys’ fees.

16
17
18
Dated: March 26, 2019

/s/ Phillip J. Wiese

19
Counsel for Plaintiff
20
21
22
23

Dated: March 26, 2019

/s/ Martine N. D’Agostino
Counsel for Defendants

24
25
26
27
28

2
DB2/ 36161006.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL (C 14-02726 JST)

1

Per the Parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

Dated:

March 27, 2019
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
DB2/ 36161006.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL (C 14-02726 JST)