Quine v. Brown et al
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Rule 35 Independent Medical Examination of Plaintiff filed by S. Pajong, M.D., D. Bright, J. Dunlap, Jeffrey Beard, J. Lewis. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 4, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
MARISA Y. KIRSCHENBAUER
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
PREETI K. BAJWA
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 232484
455 Golden Gate Ave., Ste. 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102\
Telephone: (415) 703-1621
Fax: (415) 703-5843
E-mail: Preeti.Bajwa@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
S. Pajong, J. Lewis, D. Bright, J. Beard, and J.
Dunlap
HERMAN J. HOYING
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
ONE MARKET, SPEAR STREET TOWER
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-1126
TELEPHONE: 415.442.1000
FACSIMILE: 415.442.1001
HHOYING@MORGANLEWIS.COM
Attorney for Plaintiff Rodney James Quine aka
Shiloh Quine
14
15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
RODNEY JAMES QUINE,
C 14-02726 JST
20
21
v.
22
23
24
BROWN, et al.,
Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR RULE 35 INDEPENDENT
MEDICAL EXAMINATION OF
PLAINTIFF
Judge:
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
Trial Date:
January 4, 2016
Defendants. Action Filed: June 12, 2014
25
26
The Parties, having met and conferred, stipulate to the independent medical examination of
27
Plaintiff Rodney James Quine aka Shiloh Quine per Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil
28
Procedure. The examination is to take place on Friday June 19, 2015, at Mule Creek State Prison,
1
Stip. and [Proposed] Order for IME (C 14-02726 JST)
1
at a mutually convenient time to be determined by the Parties and Mule Creek State Prison, by
2
defendants’ proposed expert witness, Dr. Richard Carroll, Ph.D. The independent medical
3
examination will include a 2-3 hour clinical interview of Plaintiff regarding her gender identity
4
dysphoria and her desire for sex-reassignment surgery and may include the Minnesota
5
Multiphasic Personality Inventory - 2 (MMPI-2), the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory - III
6
(MCMI-III) Symptom Checklist, and the 90- Revised (SCL-90-R) Stress Inventory Sexual
7
Response Questionnaire Sexual Fantasy Questionnaire
8
Plaintiff takes no position at this time with regard to whether Dr. Carroll is a “suitably
9
licensed or certified” examiner under Rule 35 and the Parties agree that Plaintiff, by entering this
10
stipulation, does not waive any right and expressly reserves all rights to challenge Dr. Carroll’s
11
qualifications and opinions. Counsel for Plaintiff will be permitted to be present for the initial
12
introduction of Plaintiff to Dr. Carroll and present outside of the examination room but counsel
13
for Plaintiff shall not be permitted to attend the examination.
14
15
16
Except as expressly noted, the Parties agree that the standard for a Rule 35 examination has
been met.
SO STIPULATED, on June 2, 2015:
17
20
21
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. TA
UNIT
ED
S
22
/s/ Preeti K. Bajwa
_________________________
PREETI K. BAJWA1
Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants S. Pajong,
J. Lewis, D. Bright, J. Beard, and J.
Dunlap
23
SF2015400052/11889276.doc
RT
27
HON. JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
NO
26
June 4, 2015
Dated
1
S . Ti ga r
Under Northern District General Order 45, subsection X.B., Defendant’s counsel attests
that Plaintiff’s counsel’s gave h34 permission to electronically sign this Stipulation on his behalf.
E
H
28
n
J u d ge J o
2
LI
25
DERED
SO OR
_________________________
IT IS
RN
A
24
R NIA
19
/s/ Herman J. Hoying
_________________________
HERMAN J. HOYING
Attorney for Plaintiff
Rodney James Quine aka Shiloh Quine
FO
18
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Stip. and [Proposed] Order for IME (C 14-02726 JST)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?