Quine v. Brown et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Rule 35 Independent Medical Examination of Plaintiff filed by S. Pajong, M.D., D. Bright, J. Dunlap, Jeffrey Beard, J. Lewis. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 4, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California MARISA Y. KIRSCHENBAUER Supervising Deputy Attorney General PREETI K. BAJWA Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 232484 455 Golden Gate Ave., Ste. 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102\ Telephone: (415) 703-1621 Fax: (415) 703-5843 E-mail: Preeti.Bajwa@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants S. Pajong, J. Lewis, D. Bright, J. Beard, and J. Dunlap HERMAN J. HOYING MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ONE MARKET, SPEAR STREET TOWER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-1126 TELEPHONE: 415.442.1000 FACSIMILE: 415.442.1001 HHOYING@MORGANLEWIS.COM Attorney for Plaintiff Rodney James Quine aka Shiloh Quine 14 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 RODNEY JAMES QUINE, C 14-02726 JST 20 21 v. 22 23 24 BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR RULE 35 INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF Judge: The Honorable Jon S. Tigar Trial Date: January 4, 2016 Defendants. Action Filed: June 12, 2014 25 26 The Parties, having met and conferred, stipulate to the independent medical examination of 27 Plaintiff Rodney James Quine aka Shiloh Quine per Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil 28 Procedure. The examination is to take place on Friday June 19, 2015, at Mule Creek State Prison, 1 Stip. and [Proposed] Order for IME (C 14-02726 JST) 1 at a mutually convenient time to be determined by the Parties and Mule Creek State Prison, by 2 defendants’ proposed expert witness, Dr. Richard Carroll, Ph.D. The independent medical 3 examination will include a 2-3 hour clinical interview of Plaintiff regarding her gender identity 4 dysphoria and her desire for sex-reassignment surgery and may include the Minnesota 5 Multiphasic Personality Inventory - 2 (MMPI-2), the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory - III 6 (MCMI-III) Symptom Checklist, and the 90- Revised (SCL-90-R) Stress Inventory Sexual 7 Response Questionnaire Sexual Fantasy Questionnaire 8 Plaintiff takes no position at this time with regard to whether Dr. Carroll is a “suitably 9 licensed or certified” examiner under Rule 35 and the Parties agree that Plaintiff, by entering this 10 stipulation, does not waive any right and expressly reserves all rights to challenge Dr. Carroll’s 11 qualifications and opinions. Counsel for Plaintiff will be permitted to be present for the initial 12 introduction of Plaintiff to Dr. Carroll and present outside of the examination room but counsel 13 for Plaintiff shall not be permitted to attend the examination. 14 15 16 Except as expressly noted, the Parties agree that the standard for a Rule 35 examination has been met. SO STIPULATED, on June 2, 2015: 17 20 21 RT U O S DISTRICT TE C PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. TA UNIT ED S 22 /s/ Preeti K. Bajwa _________________________ PREETI K. BAJWA1 Deputy Attorney General Attorney for Defendants S. Pajong, J. Lewis, D. Bright, J. Beard, and J. Dunlap 23 SF2015400052/11889276.doc RT 27 HON. JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge NO 26 June 4, 2015 Dated 1 S . Ti ga r Under Northern District General Order 45, subsection X.B., Defendant’s counsel attests that Plaintiff’s counsel’s gave h34 permission to electronically sign this Stipulation on his behalf. E H 28 n J u d ge J o 2 LI 25 DERED SO OR _________________________ IT IS RN A 24 R NIA 19 /s/ Herman J. Hoying _________________________ HERMAN J. HOYING Attorney for Plaintiff Rodney James Quine aka Shiloh Quine FO 18 F D IS T IC T O R C Stip. and [Proposed] Order for IME (C 14-02726 JST)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?