Carnes v. Atria Senior Living, Inc.
Filing
34
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 32 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Motion for Ad Litem.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2014)
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
REUBEN B. JACOBSON, SB# 167972
E-Mail: Reuben.Jacobson@lewisbrisbois.com
2
333 Bush Street, Suite 1100
3 San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: 415.438.6612
4 Facsimile: 415.434.0882
5 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
JEFFREY S. RANEN, SB# 224285
E-Mail: Jeffrey.Ranen@lewisbrisbois.com
6
CHRIS CROCKETT, SB# 281388
E-Mail: Chris.Crockett@lewisbrisbois.com
7
221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 1200
8 Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: 213.250.1800
9 Facsimile: 213.250.7900
10 Attorneys for Defendant, ATRIA SENIOR
LIVING, INC.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16 THOMAS CARNES, by and through his
Guardian ad Litem, Juliana Christine Clegg,
17 on his own behalf and on behalf of others
similarly situated,
18
Plaintiff,
19
vs.
20
ATRIA SENIOR LIVING, INC., and DOES 1
21 through 100,
Defendants.
22
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-02727-VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING
OF DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD
LITEM
Judge:
Trial Date:
Hon. Vince Chhabria
None Set
[Civil L.R. 6-1(a)]
23
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties hereby provide notice of their stipulation to
25 extend the time for Defendant’s deadline to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for
26 Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem as follow:
27 / / /
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28 / / /
4824-6197-6094.1
3:14-cv-02727-VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION
TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
1
Plaintiff filed his Motion for Appointment of Juliana Christine Clegg as Guardian Ad
2 Litem on June 12, 2014. The current deadline for Defendant to file its brief in opposition of
3 Plaintiff’s Motion is September 23, 2014. The Parties, upon meeting and conferring, have agreed
4 to modify the deadline for Defendant’s Opposition. The Parties’ stipulation will not alter the date
5 of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. Now, the parties stipulate that the
6 deadline for Defendant to file his Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion will be extended by 7 days from
7 September 23, 2014, to September 30, 2014.
8 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
9 DATED: September 23, 2014
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
LLP
10
11
By:
12
13
14 DATED: September 23, 2014
/s/ Jeffrey S. Ranen
Jeffrey S. Ranen
Attorneys for Defendant,
ATRIA SENIOR LIVING, INC.
STEBNER & ASSOCIATES
15
16
By:
17
18
/s/ Kathryn A. Stebner
Kathryn A. Stebner
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the proposed Class,
THOMAS CARNES
19
20
21
DECLARATION OF CONSENT
I, JEFFREY S. RANEN, hereby declare pursuant to General Order 45, § X(B), that I have
22 obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from Kathryn A. Stebner.
23
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
24
Executed on September 23, 2014, in the City of Los Angeles, California.
25
By:
26
/s/ Jeffrey S. Ranen
Jeffrey S. Ranen
27
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28
4824-6197-6094.1
3:14-cv-02727-VC
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION
TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
September 26, 2014
4 DATED: _________________
Honorable Vince Chhabria
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
28
4824-6197-6094.1
3:14-cv-02727-VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION
TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?