Carnes v. Atria Senior Living, Inc.

Filing 34

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 32 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Motion for Ad Litem.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2014)

Download PDF
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP REUBEN B. JACOBSON, SB# 167972 E-Mail: Reuben.Jacobson@lewisbrisbois.com 2 333 Bush Street, Suite 1100 3 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.438.6612 4 Facsimile: 415.434.0882 5 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP JEFFREY S. RANEN, SB# 224285 E-Mail: Jeffrey.Ranen@lewisbrisbois.com 6 CHRIS CROCKETT, SB# 281388 E-Mail: Chris.Crockett@lewisbrisbois.com 7 221 North Figueroa Street, Suite 1200 8 Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: 213.250.1800 9 Facsimile: 213.250.7900 10 Attorneys for Defendant, ATRIA SENIOR LIVING, INC. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 THOMAS CARNES, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Juliana Christine Clegg, 17 on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, 18 Plaintiff, 19 vs. 20 ATRIA SENIOR LIVING, INC., and DOES 1 21 through 100, Defendants. 22 CASE NO. 3:14-cv-02727-VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM Judge: Trial Date: Hon. Vince Chhabria None Set [Civil L.R. 6-1(a)] 23 24 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties hereby provide notice of their stipulation to 25 extend the time for Defendant’s deadline to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for 26 Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem as follow: 27 / / / LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 28 / / / 4824-6197-6094.1 3:14-cv-02727-VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM 1 Plaintiff filed his Motion for Appointment of Juliana Christine Clegg as Guardian Ad 2 Litem on June 12, 2014. The current deadline for Defendant to file its brief in opposition of 3 Plaintiff’s Motion is September 23, 2014. The Parties, upon meeting and conferring, have agreed 4 to modify the deadline for Defendant’s Opposition. The Parties’ stipulation will not alter the date 5 of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. Now, the parties stipulate that the 6 deadline for Defendant to file his Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion will be extended by 7 days from 7 September 23, 2014, to September 30, 2014. 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 9 DATED: September 23, 2014 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 10 11 By: 12 13 14 DATED: September 23, 2014 /s/ Jeffrey S. Ranen Jeffrey S. Ranen Attorneys for Defendant, ATRIA SENIOR LIVING, INC. STEBNER & ASSOCIATES 15 16 By: 17 18 /s/ Kathryn A. Stebner Kathryn A. Stebner Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the proposed Class, THOMAS CARNES 19 20 21 DECLARATION OF CONSENT I, JEFFREY S. RANEN, hereby declare pursuant to General Order 45, § X(B), that I have 22 obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from Kathryn A. Stebner. 23 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 24 Executed on September 23, 2014, in the City of Los Angeles, California. 25 By: 26 /s/ Jeffrey S. Ranen Jeffrey S. Ranen 27 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 28 4824-6197-6094.1 3:14-cv-02727-VC 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 September 26, 2014 4 DATED: _________________ Honorable Vince Chhabria United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 28 4824-6197-6094.1 3:14-cv-02727-VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF DEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?