Wasserman et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Filing 12

ORDER re 11 Stipulation To Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint filed by Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/18/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 STEVEN M. SELNA (SBN 133409) steven.selna@dbr.com JOHN J. POWERS (SBN 145623) john.powers@dbr.com SANJEET S. GANJAM (SBN 285615) sanjeet.ganjam@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 Attorneys for Defendants JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 ANDREW WASSERMAN, 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, and DOES 1-5, Case No. 3:14-CV-02739-JCS STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Judge: Hon. Joseph C. Spero Courtroom: G Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 WHEREAS Plaintiff ANDREW WASSERMAN (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), initiated the above-entitled action on June 12, 2014; WHEREAS Plaintiff served JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & 25 JOHNSON, and JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC (hereinafter 26 “Defendants”) the Complaint on June 20, 2014; 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO WHEREAS Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint (“First Amended Complaint”) on June 30, 2014; STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER ACTIVE/ 76215245.1 CASE NO 3:14-CV-02739-JCS 1 2 3 4 WHEREAS Plaintiff served each of the Defendants the First Amended Complaint on July 1, 2014; WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendants must file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint by July 15, 2014; and 5 WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the “Parties may stipulate in writing, without 6 a Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint”: 7 The undersigned counsels of record of the respective parties in the above-entitled action 8 hereby STIPULATE that the last day for Defendants to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s 9 First Amended Complaint shall be July 29, 2014. 10 11 Dated: July 15, 2014 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 12 13 By: /s/ Sanjeet S. Ganjam Steven M. Selna John J. Powers Sanjeet S. Ganjam 14 15 Attorneys for Defendants JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC 16 17 18 19 Dated: July 15, 2014 LAW OFFICE OF AARON MYERS 20 21 By: /s/Aaron Myers Aaron Myers 22 Attorney for Plaintiff ANDREW WASSERMAN 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER ACTIVE/ 76215245.1 -2- CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02739-JCS 1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 2 3 I, Sanjeet S. Ganjam, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 4 attached STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED 5 COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that the following 6 attorneys have concurred in this filing: Aaron Myers, counsel for Plaintiff. 7 8 Dated: July 15, 2014 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 9 10 By: /s/ Sanjeet S. Ganjam Steven M. Selna John J. Powers Sanjeet S. Ganjam 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC 14 NO RT 20 ER pero ph C. S H 21 se Judge Jo LI 19 22 R NIA S Dated: 7/18/14 A 18 UNIT ED 17 RT U O 16 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 15 N D IS T IC T R OF C 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER ACTIVE/ 76215245.1 -3- CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02739-JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?