Wasserman et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Filing
12
ORDER re 11 Stipulation To Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint filed by Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/18/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
STEVEN M. SELNA (SBN 133409)
steven.selna@dbr.com
JOHN J. POWERS (SBN 145623)
john.powers@dbr.com
SANJEET S. GANJAM (SBN 285615)
sanjeet.ganjam@dbr.com
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2235
Telephone:
(415) 591-7500
Facsimile:
(415) 591-7510
Attorneys for Defendants
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and JANSSEN
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
ANDREW WASSERMAN,
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JANSSEN
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT,
LLC, and DOES 1-5,
Case No. 3:14-CV-02739-JCS
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Judge:
Hon. Joseph C. Spero
Courtroom: G
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
WHEREAS Plaintiff ANDREW WASSERMAN (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), initiated the
above-entitled action on June 12, 2014;
WHEREAS Plaintiff served JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON &
25
JOHNSON, and JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC (hereinafter
26
“Defendants”) the Complaint on June 20, 2014;
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
WHEREAS Plaintiff filed an amended Complaint (“First Amended Complaint”) on June
30, 2014;
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
ACTIVE/ 76215245.1
CASE NO 3:14-CV-02739-JCS
1
2
3
4
WHEREAS Plaintiff served each of the Defendants the First Amended Complaint on July
1, 2014;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendants must file a
responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint by July 15, 2014; and
5
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the “Parties may stipulate in writing, without
6
a Court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint”:
7
The undersigned counsels of record of the respective parties in the above-entitled action
8
hereby STIPULATE that the last day for Defendants to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s
9
First Amended Complaint shall be July 29, 2014.
10
11
Dated: July 15, 2014
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
12
13
By: /s/ Sanjeet S. Ganjam
Steven M. Selna
John J. Powers
Sanjeet S. Ganjam
14
15
Attorneys for Defendants
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and JANSSEN
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC
16
17
18
19
Dated: July 15, 2014
LAW OFFICE OF AARON MYERS
20
21
By: /s/Aaron Myers
Aaron Myers
22
Attorney for Plaintiff
ANDREW WASSERMAN
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
ACTIVE/ 76215245.1
-2-
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02739-JCS
1
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
2
3
I, Sanjeet S. Ganjam, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
4
attached STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
5
COMPLAINT. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that the following
6
attorneys have concurred in this filing: Aaron Myers, counsel for Plaintiff.
7
8
Dated: July 15, 2014
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
9
10
By: /s/ Sanjeet S. Ganjam
Steven M. Selna
John J. Powers
Sanjeet S. Ganjam
11
12
13
Attorneys for Defendants
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, and JANSSEN
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC
14
NO
RT
20
ER
pero
ph C. S
H
21
se
Judge Jo
LI
19
22
R NIA
S
Dated: 7/18/14
A
18
UNIT
ED
17
RT
U
O
16
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
15
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER
ACTIVE/ 76215245.1
-3-
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02739-JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?