Wasserman et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Filing
23
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 21 Stipulation selecting ENE.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Andrew Wasserman
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Janssen Pharmaceuticals,
,
Inc., et al.
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
CASE NO. ______________________
14-CV-02739-VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9
120 days
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated:___________
8/26/14
____________________________
/s/ Aaron Myers
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated:____________
8/26/14
____________________________
/s/ John J. Powers
Attorney for Defendant
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
XX
9
9
Dated:
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 27, 2014
__________________________________
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
1
2
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, John J. Powers, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
attached STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. In
4
compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic
5
signatures corresponding to any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-
6
filed document.
7
8
DATED: August 26, 2014
9
/s/ John J. Powers
John J. Powers
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH
50 Fremont St., 20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
10
11
12
Counsel for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
Johnson & Johnson, and Janssen Research
and Development, LLC
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D RINKER B IDDLE &
R EATH LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI S CO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02739-JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?