Wasserman et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Filing 23

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 21 Stipulation selecting ENE.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2014)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Andrew Wasserman , Plaintiff(s), v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, , Inc., et al. Defendant(s). _______________________________/ CASE NO. ______________________ 14-CV-02739-VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 120 days other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dated:___________ 8/26/14 ____________________________ /s/ Aaron Myers Attorney for Plaintiff Dated:____________ 8/26/14 ____________________________ /s/ John J. Powers Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER XX 9 9 Dated: The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. August 27, 2014 __________________________________ DISTRICT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2 1 2 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, John J. Powers, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 attached STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. In 4 compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic 5 signatures corresponding to any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e- 6 filed document. 7 8 DATED: August 26, 2014 9 /s/ John J. Powers John J. Powers DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH 50 Fremont St., 20th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 10 11 12 Counsel for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, and Janssen Research and Development, LLC 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI S CO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. 3:14-CV-02739-JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?