Montoya v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 67

ORDER granting 66 STIPULATION as to 53 , 64 Motions for Summary Judgment.Responses due by 1/4/2016. Replies due by 1/18/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/30/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 LAURENCE F. PADWAY (SBN 83914) Email: Lpadway@padway.com LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY 1516 Oak Street, Suite 109 Alameda, California 94501 Telephone: (510) 814-6100 Fax: (510) 814-0650 Attorney for Plaintiff MARLON MONTOYA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ADRIENNE C. PUBLICOVER (SBN 161432) Email: Adrienne.publicover@wilsonelser.com DENNIS J. RHODES (SBN 168417) Email: dennis.rhodes@wilsonelser.com WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 525 Market Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Tel: (415) 433-0990 Fax: (415) 434-1370 Attorneys for Defendants RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and THE RSL GROUP AND BLANKET TRUST 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARLON MONTOYA, ) CASE NO. 3:14-cv-02740-WHO ) Plaintiffs, ) ) STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION FOR v. ) PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY FOR ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, THE RSL ) GROUP AND BLANKET TRUST, ) ) Action Filed: June 13, 2014 ) Defendants ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE USDC Northern District Court Case No.3:14-cv-02740-WHO 28 1486507v.1 1 2 3 Whereas, the due date for the filing of Plaintiff’s opposition/reply in support of motion for summary judgment is December 30, 2015; and 4 5 6 Whereas, counsel for plaintiff requires a short extension of time to January 4, 2016 to file this pleading as a result of a flareup of a chronic cardiac condition; 7 8 9 Whereas, the parties have conferred and stipulate to this extension, and to a similar extension of five days for the filing by defendant of its reply/sur-reply brief. 10 11 The hearing date will remain on February 3, 2016. The revised briefing schedule is: 12 13 Plaintiff's opposition/reply brief: 12/30/2015 14 Defense reply/sur-reply brief: 1/18/2016 15 16 Hearing date: February 3, 2016 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 19 20 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: 21 22 Dated: December 29, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/Laurence F. Padway LAURENCE F. PADWAY Attorneys for Plaintiff MARLON MONTOYA 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND FILING DEADLINE USDC Northern District Court Case No. 3:14-cv-02740-WHO 1 2 Dated: December 29, 2015 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 3 4 By: /s/Dennis J. Rhodes ADRIENNE C. PUBLICOVER DENNIS J. RHODES Attorneys for Defendants RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and THE RSL GROUP AND BLANKET TRUST 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Laurence F. Padway, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 15 obtained from any signatories indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed 16 document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 17 the foregoing is true and correct. 18 19 Dated: December 29, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY 20 21 22 By: /s/Laurence F. Padway LAURENCE F. PADWAY Attorneys for Plaintiff MARLON MONTOYA 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND FILING DEADLINE USDC Northern District Court Case No. 3:14-cv-02740-WHO 1 2 ORDER 3 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is so ordered. Briefs are due as follows: 4 Plaintiff's opposition/reply brief: 1/4/2016 5 Defense reply/sur-reply brief: 1/18/2016 6 The hearing date of February 3 remains on calendar. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 Date: December 30, 2015 By: HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND FILING DEADLINE USDC Northern District Court Case No. 3:14-cv-02740-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?