Montoya v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
67
ORDER granting 66 STIPULATION as to 53 , 64 Motions for Summary Judgment.Responses due by 1/4/2016. Replies due by 1/18/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/30/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
LAURENCE F. PADWAY (SBN 83914)
Email: Lpadway@padway.com
LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY
1516 Oak Street, Suite 109
Alameda, California 94501
Telephone: (510) 814-6100
Fax:
(510) 814-0650
Attorney for Plaintiff
MARLON MONTOYA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ADRIENNE C. PUBLICOVER (SBN 161432)
Email: Adrienne.publicover@wilsonelser.com
DENNIS J. RHODES (SBN 168417)
Email: dennis.rhodes@wilsonelser.com
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: (415) 433-0990
Fax: (415) 434-1370
Attorneys for Defendants
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY and THE RSL
GROUP AND BLANKET TRUST
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARLON MONTOYA,
) CASE NO. 3:14-cv-02740-WHO
)
Plaintiffs,
)
) STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION FOR
v.
) PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY FOR
) SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE
)
INSURANCE COMPANY, THE RSL
)
GROUP AND BLANKET TRUST,
)
) Action Filed: June 13, 2014
)
Defendants
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
USDC Northern District Court Case No.3:14-cv-02740-WHO
28
1486507v.1
1
2
3
Whereas, the due date for the filing of Plaintiff’s opposition/reply in support of motion
for summary judgment is December 30, 2015; and
4
5
6
Whereas, counsel for plaintiff requires a short extension of time to January 4, 2016 to file
this pleading as a result of a flareup of a chronic cardiac condition;
7
8
9
Whereas, the parties have conferred and stipulate to this extension, and to a similar
extension of five days for the filing by defendant of its reply/sur-reply brief.
10
11
The hearing date will remain on February 3, 2016. The revised briefing schedule is:
12
13
Plaintiff's opposition/reply brief: 12/30/2015
14
Defense reply/sur-reply brief: 1/18/2016
15
16
Hearing date: February 3, 2016
17
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
19
20
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
21
22
Dated: December 29, 2015
LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY
23
24
25
26
27
28
By: /s/Laurence F. Padway
LAURENCE F. PADWAY
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARLON MONTOYA
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND FILING DEADLINE
USDC Northern District Court Case No. 3:14-cv-02740-WHO
1
2
Dated: December 29, 2015
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
3
4
By: /s/Dennis J. Rhodes
ADRIENNE C. PUBLICOVER
DENNIS J. RHODES
Attorneys for Defendants
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY and THE RSL
GROUP AND BLANKET TRUST
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
I, Laurence F. Padway, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
15
obtained from any signatories indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed
16
document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that
17
the foregoing is true and correct.
18
19
Dated: December 29, 2015
LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY
20
21
22
By: /s/Laurence F. Padway
LAURENCE F. PADWAY
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARLON MONTOYA
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND FILING DEADLINE
USDC Northern District Court Case No. 3:14-cv-02740-WHO
1
2
ORDER
3
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is so ordered. Briefs are due as follows:
4
Plaintiff's opposition/reply brief: 1/4/2016
5
Defense reply/sur-reply brief: 1/18/2016
6
The hearing date of February 3 remains on calendar.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
Date: December 30, 2015
By:
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND FILING DEADLINE
USDC Northern District Court Case No. 3:14-cv-02740-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?