Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Wowza Media Systems, LLC et al
Filing
38
ORDER REGARDING WOWZA'S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING re 36 Proposed Order filed by Wowza Media Systems, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 28, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Diana Chang (Bar No. 287624)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 439-1400
Facsimile: (415) 439-1500
Barry F. Irwin, P.C. (pro hac vice)
IRWIN IP LLC
1333 Burr Ridge Pkwy, Suite 200
Burr Ridge, IL 60527
Telephone: (630) 756-3101
Facsimile: (630) 756-3100
Brent P. Ray (pro hac vice)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
300 North LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: (312) 862-2000
Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
Attorneys for Defendants
WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC, and
COFFEE CUP PARTNERS, INC.
(f/k/a WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, INC.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
a Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,
21
22
Case No. 3:14-cv-02778-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
WOWZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING
vs.
23
24
25
WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC, a
Delaware Corporation, and COFFEE CUP
PARTNERS, INC. (f/k/a WOWZA MEDIA
SYSTEMS, INC.), a California Corporation,
26
Defendants.
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WOWZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING
Case No. 3:14-cv-02778
KE 32804703.2
1
2
3
As discussed at the Joint Case Management Conference held on July 22, 2014, the parties have
agreed on the following schedule regarding Wowza’s pending Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 24):
4
Event(s)
6
August 21, 2014
Adobe Opposition to Motion to Dismiss due
7
September 9, 2014
8
October 2, 2014 at 1:30pm
ER
14
15
R NIA
Respectfully submitted,
A
H
13
i ga r
FO
n S. T
u d ge J o
J
LI
Dated: July 23, 2014
RT
12
D
RDERE
OO
Signed:
____________________________________
IT IS S
Dated: July 28, 2014
U.S.D.C.
NO
11
UNIT
ED
10
WowzaTRIC to Motion to Dismiss due
S DIS Reply T
TE
C
TA Hearing on Wowza Motion to Dismiss
RT
U
O
9
S
Date
5
N
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
C
F
D I S T I C T O Brent P. Ray (pro hac vice)
R
Diana Chang
IRWIN IP LLC
Barry F. Irwin (pro hac vice)
16
17
By:
18
/s/ Barry F. Irwin
Attorneys for Defendant
WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC.
19
20
21
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Michael A. Berta
Maulik Girish Shah
Ryan J. Casamiquela
22
23
24
By:
25
26
/s/ Michael A. Berta
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WOWZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING
Case No. 3:14-cv-02778
KE 32804703.2
1
ATTESTATION
2
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I, Barry F. Irwin, attest that all signatories listed, and on whose
3
behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s consent and have authorized the filing.
4
By:
5
/s/ Barry F. Irwin
6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
8
9
I declare that I am over the age of 18 years, am not a party to the foregoing Action, and am
employed in the County of Cook. My business address is Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 300 N. LaSalle,
Chicago, IL 60654.
10
On July 23, 2014, I caused to be served a copy of the following document:
11
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WOWZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING
12
13
on the following individuals and entities, as addressed below, by the means indicated below:
14
15
16
17
X
The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed with the Court’s
CM/ECF system, automatically effecting service on counsel of record for all parties to this
action.
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of, or permitted to practice
before, this Court at whose direction the service was made.
18
19
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed at Chicago,
Illinois on July 23, 2014.
20
21
By:
22
/s/ Michael Buchanio
Michael Buchanio
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WOWZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING
Case No. 3:14-cv-02778
KE 32804703.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?