Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Wowza Media Systems, LLC et al

Filing 38

ORDER REGARDING WOWZA'S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING re 36 Proposed Order filed by Wowza Media Systems, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 28, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Diana Chang (Bar No. 287624) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 Barry F. Irwin, P.C. (pro hac vice) IRWIN IP LLC 1333 Burr Ridge Pkwy, Suite 200 Burr Ridge, IL 60527 Telephone: (630) 756-3101 Facsimile: (630) 756-3100 Brent P. Ray (pro hac vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 North LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: (312) 862-2000 Facsimile: (312) 862-2200 Attorneys for Defendants WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC, and COFFEE CUP PARTNERS, INC. (f/k/a WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, INC.) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, 21 22 Case No. 3:14-cv-02778-JST [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WOWZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING vs. 23 24 25 WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC, a Delaware Corporation, and COFFEE CUP PARTNERS, INC. (f/k/a WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, INC.), a California Corporation, 26 Defendants. 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WOWZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING Case No. 3:14-cv-02778 KE 32804703.2 1 2 3 As discussed at the Joint Case Management Conference held on July 22, 2014, the parties have agreed on the following schedule regarding Wowza’s pending Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 24): 4 Event(s) 6 August 21, 2014 Adobe Opposition to Motion to Dismiss due 7 September 9, 2014 8 October 2, 2014 at 1:30pm ER 14 15 R NIA Respectfully submitted, A H 13 i ga r FO n S. T u d ge J o J LI Dated: July 23, 2014 RT 12 D RDERE OO Signed: ____________________________________ IT IS S Dated: July 28, 2014 U.S.D.C. NO 11 UNIT ED 10 WowzaTRIC to Motion to Dismiss due S DIS Reply T TE C TA Hearing on Wowza Motion to Dismiss RT U O 9 S Date 5 N KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP C F D I S T I C T O Brent P. Ray (pro hac vice) R Diana Chang IRWIN IP LLC Barry F. Irwin (pro hac vice) 16 17 By: 18 /s/ Barry F. Irwin Attorneys for Defendant WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC. 19 20 21 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Michael A. Berta Maulik Girish Shah Ryan J. Casamiquela 22 23 24 By: 25 26 /s/ Michael A. Berta Attorneys for Plaintiff ADOBE SYSTEMS INC. 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WOWZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING Case No. 3:14-cv-02778 KE 32804703.2 1 ATTESTATION 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I, Barry F. Irwin, attest that all signatories listed, and on whose 3 behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s consent and have authorized the filing. 4 By: 5 /s/ Barry F. Irwin 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 8 9 I declare that I am over the age of 18 years, am not a party to the foregoing Action, and am employed in the County of Cook. My business address is Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 300 N. LaSalle, Chicago, IL 60654. 10 On July 23, 2014, I caused to be served a copy of the following document: 11 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WOWZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING 12 13 on the following individuals and entities, as addressed below, by the means indicated below: 14 15 16 17 X The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed with the Court’s CM/ECF system, automatically effecting service on counsel of record for all parties to this action. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of, or permitted to practice before, this Court at whose direction the service was made. 18 19 I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed at Chicago, Illinois on July 23, 2014. 20 21 By: 22 /s/ Michael Buchanio Michael Buchanio 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WOWZA’S MOTION TO DISMISS BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING Case No. 3:14-cv-02778 KE 32804703.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?