Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Wowza Media Systems, LLC et al
Filing
39
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE re 35 Proposed Order filed by Wowza Media Systems, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 28, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Diana Chang (Bar No. 287624)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 439-1400
Facsimile: (415) 439-1500
Barry F. Irwin, P.C. (pro hac vice)
IRWIN IP LLC
1333 Burr Ridge Pkwy, Suite 200
Burr Ridge, IL 60527
Telephone: (630) 756-3101
Facsimile: (630) 756-3100
Brent P. Ray (pro hac vice)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
300 North LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: (312) 862-2000
Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
Attorneys for Defendants
WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC, and
COFFEE CUP PARTNERS, INC.
(f/k/a WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, INC.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
a Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,
21
22
Case No. 3:14-cv-02778-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE
vs.
23
24
25
WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC, a
Delaware Corporation, and COFFEE CUP
PARTNERS, INC. (f/k/a WOWZA MEDIA
SYSTEMS, INC.), a California Corporation,
26
Defendants.
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:14-cv-02778
KE 32804703.2
1
2
3
As discussed at the Joint Case Management Conference held on July 22, 2014, the parties have
agreed on the following case schedule.
4
November 11, 2014
November 25, 2014
December 16, 2014
January 8, 2015
February 10, 2015
April 30, 2015
May 15, 2015
Event(s)
Last day to:
• Meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement,
ADR process selection, and discovery plan
• File ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel
• File either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference
Complete initial disclosures or state objection; File supplemental
case management statement; Disclosure of Infringement
Contentions
Further Case Management Conference (CMC); Hearing on
Wowza Motion to Dismiss
Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions
Exchange Proposed Terms for Construction
Exchange Preliminary Constructions
Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement
Completion of Claim Construction Discovery
Opening Claim Construction Brief
Responsive Claim Construction Brief
17
May 29, 2015
Reply Claim Construction Brief
18
June 19, 2015
Claim Construction Hearing and Technology Tutorial
19
45 days after claim construction
order (“CCO”)
45 days after CCO
Close of Fact Discovery
110 days after CCO
Close of Expert Discovery
Date
September 11, 2014
6
7
8
9
10
September 25, 2014
October 2, 2014 at 1:30pm
11
14
15
16
20
21
22
23
25
S DISTRICT
TE
120 days after SJ decisionsA
Jury Trial C
T
200 days after CCO
Hearing on Dispositive Motions and Daubert motions
RT
U
O
24
Designation of Testifying Expert Witness and Exchange Initial
Expert Reports
S
13
Signed:
26
UNIT
ED
12
DERED
R
____________________________________
IS SO O
IT
R NIA
5
. Ti ga r
RT
2
LI
NO
28
nS
J u d ge J o
FO
U.S.D.C.
27
A
H
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE
ER
C
Case No. 3:14-cv-02778
N
KE 32804703.2
F
D IS T IC T O
R
1
Dated: July 23, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
2
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
Brent P. Ray (pro hac vice)
Diana Chang
3
4
IRWIN IP LLC
Barry F. Irwin (pro hac vice)
5
6
By:
7
/s/ Barry F. Irwin
Attorneys for Defendant
WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC.
8
9
10
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Michael A. Berta
Maulik Girish Shah
Ryan J. Casamiquela
11
12
13
By:
/s/ Michael A. Berta
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.
15
16
17
ATTESTATION
18
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I, Barry F. Irwin, attest that all signatories listed, and on whose
19
behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s consent and have authorized the filing.
20
By:
21
/s/ Barry F. Irwin
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:14-cv-02778
KE 32804703.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?