Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Wowza Media Systems, LLC et al

Filing 39

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE re 35 Proposed Order filed by Wowza Media Systems, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 28, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Diana Chang (Bar No. 287624) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 Barry F. Irwin, P.C. (pro hac vice) IRWIN IP LLC 1333 Burr Ridge Pkwy, Suite 200 Burr Ridge, IL 60527 Telephone: (630) 756-3101 Facsimile: (630) 756-3100 Brent P. Ray (pro hac vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 North LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: (312) 862-2000 Facsimile: (312) 862-2200 Attorneys for Defendants WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC, and COFFEE CUP PARTNERS, INC. (f/k/a WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, INC.) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, 21 22 Case No. 3:14-cv-02778-JST [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE vs. 23 24 25 WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC, a Delaware Corporation, and COFFEE CUP PARTNERS, INC. (f/k/a WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, INC.), a California Corporation, 26 Defendants. 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE Case No. 3:14-cv-02778 KE 32804703.2 1 2 3 As discussed at the Joint Case Management Conference held on July 22, 2014, the parties have agreed on the following case schedule. 4 November 11, 2014 November 25, 2014 December 16, 2014 January 8, 2015 February 10, 2015 April 30, 2015 May 15, 2015 Event(s) Last day to: • Meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan • File ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel • File either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference Complete initial disclosures or state objection; File supplemental case management statement; Disclosure of Infringement Contentions Further Case Management Conference (CMC); Hearing on Wowza Motion to Dismiss Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions Exchange Proposed Terms for Construction Exchange Preliminary Constructions Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement Completion of Claim Construction Discovery Opening Claim Construction Brief Responsive Claim Construction Brief 17 May 29, 2015 Reply Claim Construction Brief 18 June 19, 2015 Claim Construction Hearing and Technology Tutorial 19 45 days after claim construction order (“CCO”) 45 days after CCO Close of Fact Discovery 110 days after CCO Close of Expert Discovery Date September 11, 2014 6 7 8 9 10 September 25, 2014 October 2, 2014 at 1:30pm 11 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 25 S DISTRICT TE 120 days after SJ decisionsA Jury Trial C T 200 days after CCO Hearing on Dispositive Motions and Daubert motions RT U O 24 Designation of Testifying Expert Witness and Exchange Initial Expert Reports S 13 Signed: 26 UNIT ED 12 DERED R ____________________________________ IS SO O IT R NIA 5 . Ti ga r RT 2 LI NO 28 nS J u d ge J o FO U.S.D.C. 27 A H [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE ER C Case No. 3:14-cv-02778 N KE 32804703.2 F D IS T IC T O R 1 Dated: July 23, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 2 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Brent P. Ray (pro hac vice) Diana Chang 3 4 IRWIN IP LLC Barry F. Irwin (pro hac vice) 5 6 By: 7 /s/ Barry F. Irwin Attorneys for Defendant WOWZA MEDIA SYSTEMS, LLC. 8 9 10 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Michael A. Berta Maulik Girish Shah Ryan J. Casamiquela 11 12 13 By: /s/ Michael A. Berta 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff ADOBE SYSTEMS INC. 15 16 17 ATTESTATION 18 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I, Barry F. Irwin, attest that all signatories listed, and on whose 19 behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s consent and have authorized the filing. 20 By: 21 /s/ Barry F. Irwin 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED CASE SCHEDULE Case No. 3:14-cv-02778 KE 32804703.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?