Murray v. Dataguard USA, LLC et al

Filing 38

ORDER GRANTING 37 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/09/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

MATT MURRAY,

11
12

Case No.: 14-cv-02829-WHO
Plaintiff,

vs.

ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
CLAIMS

13
14
15

DATAGUARD USA, LLC AND
STEVEN LEE HASTERT,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

THIS COURT, having reviewed the Stipulation for Dismissal of Claims filed in this action
by all parties, having reviewed the file and being duly advised,
HEREBY FINDS that the requirements of Rules 41(a)(1)(ii) and 41(c), Fed. R. Civ. Proc.
have been satisfied; and
HEREBY ORDERS that all claims brought by Plaintiff, Matt Murray, in this action,

23

together with claims that could have been brought that arise from or relate to the claims brought

24

by Mr. Murray, are hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE; and

25
26

FURTHER ORDERS that the counterclaims brought by Defendant, DataGuard USA,
LLC, are hereby dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

27
28

1
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS
Case No. 14-CV-02829

1
2

FURTHER ORDERS, that each of the parties shall be responsible to pay their own
attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses incurred in this action.

3
4

December 9, 2014
Dated: ____________________.

5
6
7

BY THE COURT:

8
_________________________________________
Judge, United States District Court for
The Northern District of California

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS
Case No. 14-CV-02829