Doublevision Entertainment, LLC v. Navigators Specialty Insurance Company et al
Filing
61
REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR DISCOVERY DISPUTES. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/16/2015. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
DOUBLEVISION ENTERTAINMENT,
LLC, a Tennessee limited liability
company, as assignee of Commercial
Escrow Services, Inc., a California
corporation, and Antoinette Hardstone, an
individual,
REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE
JUDGE FOR DISCOVERY
DISPUTES
Plaintiff,
14
15
No. C 14-02848 WHA
v.
17
NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York
Corporation,
18
Defendant.
16
/
19
20
21
22
This is a REFERRAL TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE to be selected for two distinct discovery
purposes:
(1)
All pending and future discovery disputes are hereby referred to a magistrate
23
judge. The district judge has tried to resolve the parties’ prior disputes, but the
24
parties have now had too many. All further hearings and briefing on these
25
discovery disputes shall be conducted according to the magistrate judge’s
26
preferences.
27
28
(2)
The same magistrate judge shall hold an evidentiary hearing to find out who is
telling the truth regarding what happened at eight A.M. on March 16, 2015, when
1
counsel were to meet and confer in the Court’s jury room. Plaintiff’s counsel,
2
Attorney Ryan Lapine, told the undersigned judge’s law clerk that defense
3
counsel, Attorney David Gabianelli, was “threatening him and yelling at him” in
4
the jury room and that the two could not be in the same room. This led to a
5
hearing on the record before the undersigned judge at eight-thirty A.M., in which
6
both sides accused the other of lying and being unprofessional. One of the parties
7
is not telling the truth. The magistrate judge will get to the bottom of this dispute
8
and make findings of fact as to what occurred in the jury room. (A transcript is
9
available for the brief hearing that took place before the undersigned judge.) The
magistrate judge should also recommend whether one or both of the counsel, as
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
appropriate, should be referred to the Northern District of California’s Standing
12
Committee on Professional Conduct for disciplinary or remedial action.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: March 16, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?