Doublevision Entertainment, LLC v. Navigators Specialty Insurance Company et al

Filing 61

REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR DISCOVERY DISPUTES. Signed by Judge Alsup on 3/16/2015. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 DOUBLEVISION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a Tennessee limited liability company, as assignee of Commercial Escrow Services, Inc., a California corporation, and Antoinette Hardstone, an individual, REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR DISCOVERY DISPUTES Plaintiff, 14 15 No. C 14-02848 WHA v. 17 NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York Corporation, 18 Defendant. 16 / 19 20 21 22 This is a REFERRAL TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE to be selected for two distinct discovery purposes: (1) All pending and future discovery disputes are hereby referred to a magistrate 23 judge. The district judge has tried to resolve the parties’ prior disputes, but the 24 parties have now had too many. All further hearings and briefing on these 25 discovery disputes shall be conducted according to the magistrate judge’s 26 preferences. 27 28 (2) The same magistrate judge shall hold an evidentiary hearing to find out who is telling the truth regarding what happened at eight A.M. on March 16, 2015, when 1 counsel were to meet and confer in the Court’s jury room. Plaintiff’s counsel, 2 Attorney Ryan Lapine, told the undersigned judge’s law clerk that defense 3 counsel, Attorney David Gabianelli, was “threatening him and yelling at him” in 4 the jury room and that the two could not be in the same room. This led to a 5 hearing on the record before the undersigned judge at eight-thirty A.M., in which 6 both sides accused the other of lying and being unprofessional. One of the parties 7 is not telling the truth. The magistrate judge will get to the bottom of this dispute 8 and make findings of fact as to what occurred in the jury room. (A transcript is 9 available for the brief hearing that took place before the undersigned judge.) The magistrate judge should also recommend whether one or both of the counsel, as 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 appropriate, should be referred to the Northern District of California’s Standing 12 Committee on Professional Conduct for disciplinary or remedial action. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: March 16, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?