Doublevision Entertainment, LLC v. Navigators Specialty Insurance Company et al

Filing 82

ORDER TO COMPLY WITH PRIOR ORDER [re 65 Order To Show Cause]. Response due by Noon on 4/8/2015. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 4/6/2015. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

DOUBLEVISION ENTERTAINMENT, LLC,
a Tennessee limited liability company, an
assignee of Commercial Escrow Service, Inc.,
a California corporation, and ANTOINETTE
HARDSTONE, an individual,

13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiffs,

No. C 14-02848 WHA

ORDER TO COMPLY
WITH PRIOR ORDER

v.
NAVIGATORS SPECIALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY, a New York corporation,
Defendant.
/

18
19

On March 18, the parties were ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be

20

remanded to Contra Costa Superior Court (Dkt. No. 65). The undersigned judge has taken the

21

parties’ responses under submission.

22

In its response, and in violation of the order to show cause, plaintiff Doublevision

23

Entertainment, LLC identified only two of the three members of Envision Advisory Group, LLC.

24

Evidence of a third member is based on Envision’s February 2010 filing to increase its member

25

count from two to three. The Court suspects and inquires whether this third member is or was

26

Indie Film Exchange, a citizen of New York. If so, there is not complete diversity and this case

27

must be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

28

By NOON on WEDNESDAY, APRIL 8, 2015, Doublevision is ORDERED to identify the
third member of Envision Advisory Group, LLC, and its citizenship at all relevant times.

1

The response shall include, but is not limited to, the certificate of amendment changing the

2

member count from two to three and the operating agreement or articles of organization for

3

Envision Advisory Group, LLC.

4

Defendant Navigators Specialty Insurance Company is likewise ordered to supply the

5

Court with any information is has on the above question. Written responses shall not exceed

6

FIVE PAGES.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
Dated: April 6, 2015.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2