Altera Corporation v. PACT XPP Technologies, AG
Filing
87
ORDER RE COURT-APPOINTED EXPERTS. Signed by Judge James Donato on 2/5/2015. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ALTERA CORPORATION,
Case No. 14-cv-02868-JD
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER RE COURT-APPOINTED
EXPERTS
9
10
PACT XPP TECHNOLOGIES, AG,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
The Court intends to appoint one or more experts pursuant to Rule 706 of the Federal
14
Rules of Evidence. See Monolithic Power Sys., Inc. v. O2 Micro Int’l Ltd., 558 F.3d 1341, 1346-
15
48 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (noting that district courts in this circuit enjoy “wide latitude” to make these
16
appointments). Any such expert will testify at trial, and the Court plans to disclose their
17
independent status to the jury, as permitted by Rule 706(d). The Court may also ask the expert or
18
experts for advice throughout the case, but any substantive communications would be in the
19
presence of the parties.
20
Any party that believes that the Court should not appoint any Rule 706 experts may submit
21
a statement of no more than two pages by February 13, 2015, explaining why. In the event that
22
the Court is unpersuaded by any such statement, the Court will then ask the parties to nominate
23
candidates.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 5, 2015
______________________________________
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?