VFS Leasing Co. v. USASIA Casino Tours/Entertainment, Inc. et al
Filing
22
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Default Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations as to 18 Report and Recommendations. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
9
VFS LEASING CO.,
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
USASIA CASINO
TOURS/ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et
al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
) Case No. 14-cv-02941-SC
)
) ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S
) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
18
19
20
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero's
21
report and recommendation (the "Report", ECF No. 18) regarding
22
Plaintiff VFS Leasing Co.'s ("VFS") motion for default judgment.
23
The report was issued on October 31, 2014, and objections were due
24
by November 14.
25
26
27
28
No objections have been filed.
The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned, and
thorough.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's
1
report. 1
2
DENIED in part as described in Judge Spero's Report.
3
will issue a judgment concurrently with this Order, consistent with
4
Judge Spero's recommendations.
VFS' motion for default judgment is GRANTED in part and
The Court
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: January 6, 2015
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
26
27
28
For completeness, the Court notes that there is a transcription
error in the Report. The final total damages sum on page 11 of the
Report is not the sum of the damage amounts calculated elsewhere in
the report. The judgment will reflect this; $494,942.49 is the
correct amount of damages owed as of October 31, 2014.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?