Nicely v. International Game Technology

Filing 46

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 45 Stipulation VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PER FRCP 41(A)(2). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Richard A. Hoyer (SBN 151931) rhoyer@hoyerlaw.com Ryan L. Hicks (SBN 260284) rhicks@hoyerlaw.com HOYER & ASSOCIATES 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: +1.415.766.3539 Facsimile: +1.415.276.1738 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK NICELY Aaron L. Agenbroad (State Bar No. 242613) alagenbroad@JonesDay.com Catherine S. Nasser (State Bar No. 246191) cnasser@JonesDay.com Allison E. Crow (State Bar No. 279078) acrow@jonesday.com JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: +1.415.626.3939 Facsimile: +1.415.875.5700 Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 MARK NICELY, 19 20 21 22 23 Case No. 14-03160 HSG Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT, IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(2) v. INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY, a Nevada Corporation, and DOES 1-25, Defendants. 24 25 Plaintiff Mark Nicely (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant International Game Technology (“IGT” 26 or “Defendant”) hereby stipulate, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the 27 above-referenced action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with all parties to bear their 28 CASE NO. 14-03160 HSG -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1) 1 own costs and fees incurred herein. The parties request that the Court enter an Order to this 2 effect. 3 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, 4 5 Dated: March 4, 2015 HOYER & ASSOCIATES 6 By: /s/ Ryan L. Hicks Ryan L. Hicks 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK NICELY 8 9 Dated: March 4, 2015 JONES DAY 10 By: /s/ Aaron L. Agenbroad Aaron L. Agenbroad 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY 13 14 15 Pursuant to stipulation, the court orders that the above-referenced action, in its entirety, be dismissed, with prejudice. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 3/5/2015 Dated: _____________________________ ____________________________________ The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Court Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 14-03160 HSG -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1) SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 1 2 I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all 3 persons whose signatures are indicated by a “conformed” signature (/S/) within this e-filed 4 document. 5 Dated: March 4, 2015 HOYER & ASSOCIATES 6 By: /s/ Ryan L. Hicks Ryan L. Hicks 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK NICELY 8 9 10 SFI-620899279v1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 14-03160 HSG -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?