Nicely v. International Game Technology
Filing
46
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 45 Stipulation VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PER FRCP 41(A)(2). (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Richard A. Hoyer (SBN 151931)
rhoyer@hoyerlaw.com
Ryan L. Hicks (SBN 260284)
rhicks@hoyerlaw.com
HOYER & ASSOCIATES
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: +1.415.766.3539
Facsimile:
+1.415.276.1738
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARK NICELY
Aaron L. Agenbroad (State Bar No. 242613)
alagenbroad@JonesDay.com
Catherine S. Nasser (State Bar No. 246191)
cnasser@JonesDay.com
Allison E. Crow (State Bar No. 279078)
acrow@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: +1.415.626.3939
Facsimile:
+1.415.875.5700
Attorneys for Defendant
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
MARK NICELY,
19
20
21
22
23
Case No. 14-03160 HSG
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT,
IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP
41(A)(2)
v.
INTERNATIONAL GAME
TECHNOLOGY, a Nevada Corporation,
and DOES 1-25,
Defendants.
24
25
Plaintiff Mark Nicely (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant International Game Technology (“IGT”
26
or “Defendant”) hereby stipulate, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the
27
above-referenced action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with all parties to bear their
28
CASE NO. 14-03160 HSG
-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)
1
own costs and fees incurred herein. The parties request that the Court enter an Order to this
2
effect.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Respectfully submitted,
4
5
Dated: March 4, 2015
HOYER & ASSOCIATES
6
By: /s/ Ryan L. Hicks
Ryan L. Hicks
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARK NICELY
8
9
Dated: March 4, 2015
JONES DAY
10
By: /s/ Aaron L. Agenbroad
Aaron L. Agenbroad
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY
13
14
15
Pursuant to stipulation, the court orders that the above-referenced action, in its entirety, be
dismissed, with prejudice.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
3/5/2015
Dated: _____________________________
____________________________________
The Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Court Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 14-03160 HSG
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
1
2
I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all
3
persons whose signatures are indicated by a “conformed” signature (/S/) within this e-filed
4
document.
5
Dated: March 4, 2015
HOYER & ASSOCIATES
6
By: /s/ Ryan L. Hicks
Ryan L. Hicks
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MARK NICELY
8
9
10
SFI-620899279v1
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 14-03160 HSG
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?