Walker et al v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Company et al

Filing 136

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 135 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Financial Indemnity Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/6/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN FITZPATRICK VANNUCCI JOHN FITZPATRICK VANNUCCI (State Bar No. 174329) 100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.981.7500 Facsimile: 415.981.5700 Attorney for Plaintiff MICHAEL WALKER SEDGWICK LLP NICHOLAS J. BOOS (State Bar No.233399) nicholas.boos@sedgwicklaw.com KARA L. DIBIASIO (State Bar No.294547) kara.dibiasio@sedgwicklaw.com 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-2834 Telephone: 415.781.7900 Facsimile: 415.781.2635 Attorneys for Defendant FINANCIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 MICHAEL WALKER, TASHELL MITCHEL, 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 3:14-cv-03161--EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE UNITRIN AUTO AND HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, FINANCIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, UNITRIN DIRECT PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY and DOES 1 TO 25, inclusive, Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 83214046v1 Case No. 3:14-cv-03161--EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Michael Walker and defendant 2 Financial Indemnity Company, through their respective counsel herein, that the above- 3 captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the 4 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that each party shall bear his or its own costs and 5 attorneys’ fees. DATED: May 5, 2016 9 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN FITZPATRICK VANNUCCI By: 10 11 12 DATED: May 5, 2016 13 15 16 17 18 19 SEDGWICK LLP By: 14 /s/ John Fitzpatrick Vannucci John Fitzpatrick Vannucci Attorney for Plaintiff MICHAEL WALKER /s/ Kara L. DiBiasio Nicholas J. Boos Kara L. DiBiasio Attorneys for Defendant FINANCIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY Attestation Regarding Signatures: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories identified above, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document. 20 S IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: UNIT ED 22 ____________________________________________ HONORABLE EDWARDward M. Chen M. CHEN Ed J DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES udge NO 25 RT ER H 26 27 28 83214046v1 DERED O OR IT IS S FO 24 5/6/2016 RT U O ORDER 21 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 8 LI 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 A 6 N D IS T IC T R OF C Case No. 3:14-cv-03161--EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?