Walker et al v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Company et al
Filing
136
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 135 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Financial Indemnity Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/6/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN FITZPATRICK VANNUCCI
JOHN FITZPATRICK VANNUCCI (State Bar No. 174329)
100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415.981.7500
Facsimile:
415.981.5700
Attorney for Plaintiff
MICHAEL WALKER
SEDGWICK LLP
NICHOLAS J. BOOS (State Bar No.233399)
nicholas.boos@sedgwicklaw.com
KARA L. DIBIASIO (State Bar No.294547)
kara.dibiasio@sedgwicklaw.com
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104-2834
Telephone:
415.781.7900
Facsimile:
415.781.2635
Attorneys for Defendant
FINANCIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
MICHAEL WALKER, TASHELL
MITCHEL,
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 3:14-cv-03161--EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
UNITRIN AUTO AND HOME INSURANCE
COMPANY, FINANCIAL INDEMNITY
COMPANY, UNITRIN DIRECT
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY
and DOES 1 TO 25, inclusive,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
83214046v1
Case No. 3:14-cv-03161--EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Michael Walker and defendant
2
Financial Indemnity Company, through their respective counsel herein, that the above-
3
captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the
4
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and that each party shall bear his or its own costs and
5
attorneys’ fees.
DATED: May 5, 2016
9
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN FITZPATRICK VANNUCCI
By:
10
11
12
DATED: May 5, 2016
13
15
16
17
18
19
SEDGWICK LLP
By:
14
/s/ John Fitzpatrick Vannucci
John Fitzpatrick Vannucci
Attorney for Plaintiff
MICHAEL WALKER
/s/ Kara L. DiBiasio
Nicholas J. Boos
Kara L. DiBiasio
Attorneys for Defendant
FINANCIAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Attestation Regarding Signatures: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer hereby attests
that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other
signatories identified above, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.
20
S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
DATED:
UNIT
ED
22
____________________________________________
HONORABLE EDWARDward M. Chen
M. CHEN
Ed
J DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES udge
NO
25
RT
ER
H
26
27
28
83214046v1
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
FO
24
5/6/2016
RT
U
O
ORDER
21
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
8
LI
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
A
6
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
Case No. 3:14-cv-03161--EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?