Walker et al v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Company et al
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation by Financial Indemnity Company, Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Company, Unitrin Direct Property & Casualty Company filed by Financial Indemnity Company, Unitrin Direct Property & Casualty Company, Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Company, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Early Neutral Evaluation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/24/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Michael Walker, Tashell
Mitchel
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Unitrin Auto and Home
,
Insurance Company, et al.
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
CASE NO. ______________________
3:14-cv-03161--EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
✔
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
✔
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated:___________
9/18/2014
Dated:____________
9/19/2014
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
____________________________
/s/ John F. Vannucci Esq
Attorney for Plaintiff
(Signature authorized on 9/18/14)
____________________________
/s/ Kara L. DiBasio
Attorney for Defendant
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
R NIA
UNIT
ED
hen
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud
__________________________________
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
FO
A
H
DISTRICT
ER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
LI
RT
9/24/14
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
NO
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
9x
9
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?