Walker et al v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Company et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation by Financial Indemnity Company, Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Company, Unitrin Direct Property & Casualty Company filed by Financial Indemnity Company, Unitrin Direct Property & Casualty Company, Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Company, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Early Neutral Evaluation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/24/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2014)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Michael Walker, Tashell Mitchel , Plaintiff(s), v. Unitrin Auto and Home , Insurance Company, et al. Defendant(s). _______________________________/ CASE NO. ______________________ 3:14-cv-03161--EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) ✔ 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ✔ 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dated:___________ 9/18/2014 Dated:____________ 9/19/2014 CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE ____________________________ /s/ John F. Vannucci Esq Attorney for Plaintiff (Signature authorized on 9/18/14) ____________________________ /s/ Kara L. DiBasio Attorney for Defendant [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. R NIA UNIT ED hen rd M. C ge Edwa Jud __________________________________ N F D IS T IC T O R When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2 FO A H DISTRICT ER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LI RT 9/24/14 DERED O OR IT IS S NO Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 9x 9 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?