Teran v. Electronic Document Processing, Inc et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 12/17/2014. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

James A. Michel
State Bar No. 184730
2912 Diamond St. #373
San Francisco CA 94131
415/ 239-4949
(Fax [phone])
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
OSCAR TERAN

6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

8
9
10

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
AND PROPOSED ORDER

Plaintiff,

11
12

Case No. C 3:14-cv-03164 LB

OSCAR TERAN, an individual,

v.

13

16

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT
PROCESSING, INC., a California
corporation; PRESCOTT
WOODFORD, individually and in his
official capacity; et al.,

17

Defendants.

18

_________________________/

14
15

Judge: Hon. Laurel Beeler
Ctrm : Courtroom C, 15th Floor
Loc’n : 450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco CA 94102

19
20

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff, OSCAR TERAN, and

21

Defendants, ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT PROCESSING, INC. and PRESCOTT

22

WOODFORD, stipulate, and the Court hereby orders, as follows:

23

1. The dispute between the parties has been settled; therefore, the claims

24

asserted by Plaintiff, OSCAR TERAN, against Defendants, ELECTRONIC

25

DOCUMENT PROCESSING, INC. and PRESCOTT WOODFORD in the above-

26

entitled case are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

27

41(a)(1).

28

2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees.
-1-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER

1
2
3
4

DATED: December 10, 2014

___/s/ James A. Michel_______
JAMES A. MICHEL
Attorney for Plaintiff
OSCAR TERAN

DATED: December 10, 2014

___/s/Jonathan M. Blute_____
JONATHAN M. BLUTE
Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney
Attorneys for Defendants
ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT
PROCESSING, INC. and PRESCOTT
WOODFORD

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

THE FOREGOING STIPULATION IS APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED.

16
17
18
19

December 17, 2014
DATED: _________________

________________________
HON. LAUREL BEELER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER