Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. v. Cepheid

Filing 73

ORDER Lifting Stay by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. A Further Case Management Conference is set for 6/14/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. An updated Case Management Statement is due by 6/7/2016. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No. 14-cv-03228-EDL ORDER LIFTING STAY v. Dkt. No. 63 CEPHEID, Defendant. The parties filed a Joint Status update on May 18, 2016. Dkt. No. 72. In it, they reported 13 on the status of the two petitions pending at the PTAB, the first concerning IPR2015-00255 claims 14 1-3 and 17-20) and the second concerning IPR2015-00881 (concerning claim 21). With regard to 15 IPR2015-00255, the parties state that PTAB issued a decision not to institute that petition. 16 Defendant requested a rehearing of that decision, which was denied on September 16, 2015. On 17 September 17, 2015, the PTAB instituted an Inter Partes Review of claim 21. On January 8, 2016, 18 Plaintiff filed a statutory disclaimer of claim 21 with the Certificate of Corrections branch of the 19 PTO. The PTO has not acted on the statutory disclaimer. Plaintiff now states that it will not assert 20 claim 21 in this action or any future action against Defendant. In light of these facts, the parties 21 state that they believe the stay in this case should be lifted without waiting for any formal 22 conclusion to IPR2015-00881. 23 24 25 26 The Court hereby lifts the stay. A further case management conference is set for June 14, 2016. The parties shall file an updated case management statement by June 7, 2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 20, 2016 27 28 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?