Cisco Systems Inc v. STMicroelectronics Inc

Filing 167

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/31/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Dan K. Webb (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
J. Erik Connolly (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Shawn J. Gebhardt (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Loren Rene (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
35 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Krista M. Enns (SBN: 206430)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
18
Plaintiff,
19
v.
20
21
22

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. and
STMICROELECTRONICS, S.R.L.,
Defendants and
Counterclaimants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:14-cv-03236-RGS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
Judge: Hon. Richard G. Seeborg

23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. 3:14-cv-03236-RGS

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff Cisco Systems,

2

Inc., on the one hand, and Defendant and Counterclaimant STMicroelectronics, Inc. and Defendant

3

STMicroelectronics, S.r.l., on the other hand (collectively, the “Parties”), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

4

41(a)(1), that all claims by the Parties in the above-captioned matter be, and upon approval by the

5

Court are hereby, dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses,

6

and attorneys’ fees.

7
8

Dated: January 30, 2017

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

9
By

10

/s/ Krista M. Enns
Krista M. Enns
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

11
12

Dated: January 30, 2017

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

13
By

14

/s/ Rachel Davidson
Rachel Davidson
Attorneys for Defendants
STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. and
STMICROELECTRONICS S.R.L.

15
16
17
18

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20
21

Dated: January ___, 2017
31

By:
The Honorable Richard G. Seeborg
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF FINAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. 3:14-cv-03236-RGS