Flaishans v. Coram Specialty Infusion Services, Inc.

Filing 19

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT Plaintiff is ordered to immediately submit a chambers copy of his Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 29, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 THOMAS FLAISHANS, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. C 14-3249 MMC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT’S STANDING ORDERS v. CORAM SPECIALTY INFUSION SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 17 / 18 On September 24, 2014, plaintiff electronically filed a document titled “Amended 19 20 Complaint.” Plaintiff has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s 21 Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each 22 document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); 23 see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 24 ¶ 2. 25 Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the 26 Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above- 27 referenced document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if he fails in the future to comply with 28 the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the 1 record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely 2 provided to the Court. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: September 29, 2014 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?