Flaishans v. Coram Specialty Infusion Services, Inc.
Filing
19
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT Plaintiff is ordered to immediately submit a chambers copy of his Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 29, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
THOMAS FLAISHANS,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. C 14-3249 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
CORAM SPECIALTY INFUSION
SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
Defendants.
17
/
18
On September 24, 2014, plaintiff electronically filed a document titled “Amended
19
20
Complaint.” Plaintiff has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s
21
Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each
22
document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7);
23
see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
24
¶ 2.
25
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
26
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-
27
referenced document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if he fails in the future to comply with
28
the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
1
record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely
2
provided to the Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: September 29, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?