Flaishans v. Coram Specialty Infusion Services, Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER RESCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE; DIRECTIONS TO PARTIES. The Status Conference currently set for February 5, 2016, is advanced to January 8, 2016. A Joint Status Conference Statement shall be filed by the parties no later than December 31, 2015, in which the parties shall address, inter alia: (1) The sum plaintiff could reasonably anticipate being awarded on his PAGA claims on behalf of himself and the aggrieved employees, if liability had been found on at least one of plaintiff' s other claims under the California Labor Code; (2) The amount for which plaintiff's other claims were settled; (3) The strength of any defenses to plaintiff's claims; and (4) Any authority on which the parties rely to support the PAGA settlement amount. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 9, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

THOMAS FLAISHANS,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

CORAM SPECIALTY INFUSION
SERVICES, INC. and DOES 1 through 10,
Defendants.

16

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER RESCHEDULING STATUS
CONFERENCE; DIRECTIONS TO
PARTIES

v.

15

17

No. C-14-3249 MMC

/

On January 9, 2015, the Court held the Initial Case Management Conference in the
above-titled action, at which the Court scheduled a Status Conference for February 5,
2016. Thereafter, on October 22, 2015, the parties filed a “Joint Stipulation of Private
Attorney General Act [(“PAGA”)] (Cal. Labor Code Sections 2699 et seq.) Representative
Action Settlement and Release,” in which the parties seek, pursuant to California Labor
Code §2699(l), the Court’s approval of their settlement of plaintiff’s representative PAGA
claims.
In light of the above-referenced filing, the Status Conference currently set for
February 5, 2016, is hereby ADVANCED to January 8, 2016. A Joint Status Conference
Statement shall be filed by the parties no later than December 31, 2015, in which the
parties shall address, inter alia:
1.

The sum plaintiff could reasonably anticipate being awarded on his PAGA

1

claims on behalf of himself and the aggrieved employees, if liability had been

2

found on at least one of plaintiff’s other claims under the California Labor

3

Code;

4

2.

The amount for which plaintiff’s other claims were settled;

5

3.

The strength of any defenses to plaintiff’s claims; and

6

4.

Any authority on which the parties rely to support the PAGA settlement

7

amount.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

Dated: November 9, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2