Gilbane Federal v. United Infrastructure Projects FZCO

Filing 101

Order as Modified by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 100 Stipulation in Support of Administrative Motion to Continue Trial Dates and Stay Case Pending Mediation.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BENNETT J. LEE (Bar No. 230482) NICHOLAS A. MERRELL (Bar No. 240795) VARELA, LEE, METZ & GUARINO, LLP 333 Bush Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-623-7000 Facsimile: 415-623-7001 blee@vlmglaw.com nmerrell@vlmglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff GILBANE FEDERAL f/k/a ITSI GILBANE COMPANY 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 Gilbane Federal f/k/a ITSI Gilbane Company, a California corporation, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 18 Case No. 3:14-cv-03254-VC STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND ORDER AS MODIFIED United Infrastructure Projects FZCO, a foreign corporation; United Infrastructure Projects SAL (Offshore) Lebanon, a foreign corporation; and United Infrastructure Projects Djibouti SARL, a foreign corporation. Defendants. 19 20 21 Pursuant to Rule 7-12 of the Civil Local Rules of the Northern District of California, 22 Plaintiff Gilbane Federal f/k/a ITSI Gilbane Company and Defendants United Infrastructure 23 Projects FZCO, United Infrastructure Projects SAL (Offshore) Lebanon and United Infrastructure 24 Projects Djibouti SARL hereby submit the following stipulation and request for enlargement of 25 trial and pretrial deadlines and for a limited stay of the lawsuit pending mediation. 26 After meeting and conferring to identify a mediator with construction experience, and 27 with the assistance of the Court’s ADR Unit, Richard Warren has been appointed as a mediator. 28 However, because of Mr. Warren’s schedule, mediation cannot occur until the first two weeks of 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ISO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION - 3:14-cv-03254-VC 1 October 2015. The parties intend to engage in the limited exchange of documents in advance of 2 mediation, but otherwise do not wish to incur additional litigation costs in the interim, which 3 would frustrate the possibility of settlement. 4 preparation into a short period of time at the end of 2015. Accordingly, the parties respectfully 5 request that the Court issue a revised scheduling order that extends the trial and pretrial deadlines 6 by approximately three months, which is roughly equal to the difference between when mediation 7 was originally scheduled to occur (in July 2015) and when in will actually occur (in October 8 2015). Nor do the parties wish to compress pretrial 9 In addition, the parties request that the case be stayed pending mediation, with a limited 10 exception: that any party may apply to the Court for an order compelling production of 11 documents under FRCP 34 to the extent that the parties have agreed in writing to produce certain 12 categories of documents voluntarily in advance of mediation. In any such case, any motion to 13 compel production of documents shall not exceed five pages, and any opposition brief shall not 14 exceed five pages. No reply brief shall be permitted. If, by July 1, 2015, the parties fail to reach 15 agreement with respect to the limited categories of documents to be voluntarily produced prior to 16 mediation, the parties may pursue any discovery allowed under FRCP 34, but the stay shall 17 remain in place in all other respects through mediation. 18 Following completion of mediation, the stay shall be lifted and litigation may proceed in 19 accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court’s April 21, 2015 scheduling 20 order. But it should be noted that Gilbane no longer intends to file a motion to disqualify 21 Defendants’ counsel. Also, the parties note that although they requested a two-week trial in their 22 joint case management conference statement, the Court ordered that trial be completed in four 23 days. The parties request that the Court consider a compromise of allowing 7 court days for trial. 24 Below is the parties’ proposed amended pretrial and trial schedule: 25 Initial Expert Discovery: Due February 2, 2016 26 Rebuttal Expert Discovery: Due March 2, 2016 27 Close of Expert Discovery: Due April 5, 2016 28 Close of Fact Discovery: Due April 5, 2016 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ISO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION - 3:14-cv-03254-VC 1 Dispositive Motion Hearing: Set for May 5, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4 2 Final Pretrial Conference: Set for July 11, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 4 3 Jury Selection: Set for July 27, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. 4 Jury Trial: Set for August 1, 2016 through August 4, 2016, and August 5 8, 2016 through August 10, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6 4. The length of trial will be determined at the pretrial conference. 7 (The parties note that the issue of whether the trial shall be a jury trial is one that is still pending 8 and that the Defendants may file a motion on the issue). 9 Dated: June 5, 2015 VARELA, LEE, METZ & GUARINO, LLP 10 By: /s/ Nicholas A. Merrell Bennett J. Lee Nicholas A. Merrell Attorneys for Plaintiff Gilbane Federal f/k/a ITSI Gilbane Company 11 12 13 14 Dated: June 5, 2015 GORDON & REES, LLP 15 16 By: /s/ Jessica L. Clouse Gregory J. Gangitano Jessica L. Clouse Ronan J. McHugh (Pro Hac) Attorneys for Defendants United Infrastructure Projects FZCO, United Infrastructure Projects SAL (Offshore) Lebanon and United Infrastructure Projects Djibouti SARL 17 18 19 20 21 S IT M NO J H ER habr ia LI RT 27 nce Ch u d g e Vi FO AS The Honorable Judge Vince Chhabria 26 28 ERED D ODIFIE RD _________________________________________ IS SO O A 25 June 12, 2015 Date:______________ UNIT ED 24 RT U O 23 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 C OF DCONTINUE TRIAL DATE STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ISO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO I S T R I C T 3 N AND STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION - 3:14-cv-03254-VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?