Gilbane Federal v. United Infrastructure Projects FZCO
Filing
101
Order as Modified by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 100 Stipulation in Support of Administrative Motion to Continue Trial Dates and Stay Case Pending Mediation.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BENNETT J. LEE (Bar No. 230482)
NICHOLAS A. MERRELL (Bar No. 240795)
VARELA, LEE, METZ & GUARINO, LLP
333 Bush Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415-623-7000
Facsimile:
415-623-7001
blee@vlmglaw.com
nmerrell@vlmglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GILBANE FEDERAL f/k/a
ITSI GILBANE COMPANY
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
Gilbane Federal f/k/a ITSI Gilbane
Company, a California corporation,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
16
17
18
Case No. 3:14-cv-03254-VC
STIPULATION IN SUPPORT OF
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND STAY
CASE PENDING MEDIATION
AND ORDER AS MODIFIED
United Infrastructure Projects FZCO, a
foreign corporation; United Infrastructure
Projects SAL (Offshore) Lebanon, a foreign
corporation; and United Infrastructure
Projects Djibouti SARL, a foreign
corporation.
Defendants.
19
20
21
Pursuant to Rule 7-12 of the Civil Local Rules of the Northern District of California,
22
Plaintiff Gilbane Federal f/k/a ITSI Gilbane Company and Defendants United Infrastructure
23
Projects FZCO, United Infrastructure Projects SAL (Offshore) Lebanon and United Infrastructure
24
Projects Djibouti SARL hereby submit the following stipulation and request for enlargement of
25
trial and pretrial deadlines and for a limited stay of the lawsuit pending mediation.
26
After meeting and conferring to identify a mediator with construction experience, and
27
with the assistance of the Court’s ADR Unit, Richard Warren has been appointed as a mediator.
28
However, because of Mr. Warren’s schedule, mediation cannot occur until the first two weeks of
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ISO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE
AND STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION - 3:14-cv-03254-VC
1
October 2015. The parties intend to engage in the limited exchange of documents in advance of
2
mediation, but otherwise do not wish to incur additional litigation costs in the interim, which
3
would frustrate the possibility of settlement.
4
preparation into a short period of time at the end of 2015. Accordingly, the parties respectfully
5
request that the Court issue a revised scheduling order that extends the trial and pretrial deadlines
6
by approximately three months, which is roughly equal to the difference between when mediation
7
was originally scheduled to occur (in July 2015) and when in will actually occur (in October
8
2015).
Nor do the parties wish to compress pretrial
9
In addition, the parties request that the case be stayed pending mediation, with a limited
10
exception: that any party may apply to the Court for an order compelling production of
11
documents under FRCP 34 to the extent that the parties have agreed in writing to produce certain
12
categories of documents voluntarily in advance of mediation. In any such case, any motion to
13
compel production of documents shall not exceed five pages, and any opposition brief shall not
14
exceed five pages. No reply brief shall be permitted. If, by July 1, 2015, the parties fail to reach
15
agreement with respect to the limited categories of documents to be voluntarily produced prior to
16
mediation, the parties may pursue any discovery allowed under FRCP 34, but the stay shall
17
remain in place in all other respects through mediation.
18
Following completion of mediation, the stay shall be lifted and litigation may proceed in
19
accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court’s April 21, 2015 scheduling
20
order. But it should be noted that Gilbane no longer intends to file a motion to disqualify
21
Defendants’ counsel. Also, the parties note that although they requested a two-week trial in their
22
joint case management conference statement, the Court ordered that trial be completed in four
23
days. The parties request that the Court consider a compromise of allowing 7 court days for trial.
24
Below is the parties’ proposed amended pretrial and trial schedule:
25
Initial Expert Discovery:
Due February 2, 2016
26
Rebuttal Expert Discovery:
Due March 2, 2016
27
Close of Expert Discovery:
Due April 5, 2016
28
Close of Fact Discovery:
Due April 5, 2016
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ISO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE
AND STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION - 3:14-cv-03254-VC
1
Dispositive Motion Hearing: Set for May 5, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4
2
Final Pretrial Conference:
Set for July 11, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 4
3
Jury Selection:
Set for July 27, 2016 at 8:30 a.m.
4
Jury Trial:
Set for August 1, 2016 through August 4, 2016, and August
5
8, 2016 through August 10, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom
6
4. The length of trial will be determined at the pretrial conference.
7
(The parties note that the issue of whether the trial shall be a jury trial is one that is still pending
8
and that the Defendants may file a motion on the issue).
9
Dated: June 5, 2015
VARELA, LEE, METZ & GUARINO, LLP
10
By: /s/ Nicholas A. Merrell
Bennett J. Lee
Nicholas A. Merrell
Attorneys for Plaintiff Gilbane Federal f/k/a ITSI
Gilbane Company
11
12
13
14
Dated: June 5, 2015
GORDON & REES, LLP
15
16
By: /s/ Jessica L. Clouse
Gregory J. Gangitano
Jessica L. Clouse
Ronan J. McHugh (Pro Hac)
Attorneys for Defendants
United Infrastructure Projects FZCO,
United Infrastructure Projects SAL (Offshore) Lebanon
and United Infrastructure Projects Djibouti SARL
17
18
19
20
21
S
IT
M
NO
J
H
ER
habr ia
LI
RT
27
nce Ch
u d g e Vi
FO
AS
The Honorable Judge Vince Chhabria
26
28
ERED
D
ODIFIE
RD
_________________________________________
IS SO O
A
25
June 12, 2015
Date:______________
UNIT
ED
24
RT
U
O
23
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
C
OF
DCONTINUE TRIAL DATE
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ISO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO I S T R I C T
3
N
AND STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION - 3:14-cv-03254-VC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?